Stephen Lendman

Washington dominates NATO policy, other members and partners pressured to go along with policies harming their own interests.

Meeting in Warsaw, Poland on July 8 and 9, 28 NATO countries, 26 partners, the UN and World Bank intend focusing on pre-agreed anti-Russian policies - US-appointed Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg highlighting the alliance’s “biggest reinforcement since the Cold War.”

“We will deploy four robust, multinational battalions to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland,” he said. “I welcome Canada’s recent announcement that it will lead one of these four battalions.”“We will also agree to develop a tailored presence in the southeast, based on a multinational brigade in Romania.”

US/NATO’s support for ISIS and other terrorist groups, aiding their spread, is the only significant world threat. Yet NATO members will increase military spending - at a time it should be greatly reduced, social justice and economic stimulus stressed, addressing long neglected popular needs.

Full story »

Breaking News: According to Kris at the Bernie National HelpDesk the "Hillary endorsement" rumor is mis-information. We are looking forward to an official press release/announcement from the Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders that the "endorsement" was a rumor and he will not be supporting Hillary Clinton.

‎

Mike Miller‎ to Bernie Sanders is my HERO 15 hrs ·
Wayne Pruski Proof that Bernie "Hillary endorsement" rumor started by mis-information........

I contacted the campaign and received the following response:

"Hello Wayne and thanks for your heartfelt note and for sharing your thoughts with us --- we will most certainly pass them on. We particularly appreciate your using the word "rumored" in your note because, as you know, this has been "rumored" countless times before.

You may have noticed more than once, that the media does not always accurately reflect what Bernie puts forth. At this time, Bernie is focused on creating the most progressive democratic platform possible https://berniesanders.com/.../sanders-outlines-next.../ and on attending the democratic national convention in Philly later this month with his 1900 delegates. He remains an active candidate. In fact, he reiterated this in a TV interview yesterday in which he was asked repeatedly if he would endorse.

Thanks so much for your continued support --- it is genuinely appreciated.

No one ever said that staging a political revolution would be easy. Thanks for standing with Bernie. It matters."

Kris
--
National HelpDesk Volunteer
Bernie 2016
Sanders Outlines Next Steps on Democratic Platform - Bernie Sanders
berniesanders.com

Your supporters will NOT support Hillary—EVER!. Don't speak and act completely against your own strong campaign assertions and stated intentions. Sanders: Nominating Clinton would be ‘disaster’ for party, nation

Boy, you talk about feelin’ the Bern!
State of the Nation

_____________________
Special Note:
The following headline just showed up in a major MSM outlet:
US elections: Sanders ‘to work with Clinton’ to beat Trump

The Sanders campaign team and supporters need to stand up and demand Bernie keep his promise.
___________________

Bernie, you screwed up your campaign so many times by your failure to take on Clinton misconduct. You cannot in good conscience support Clinton or you will betray your whole team and millions of supporters who worked tirelessly because they believed in you.

First, you let Clinton get away with Emailgate and Servergate (these are two separate crime-sprees btw) by actually giving her a pass during your first debate. Then, you permit her and her thugs to sabotage your campaign process every step of the way by cheating and bullying their way to various primary wins. Then, you practically hand her the nomination after her questionable California win before any certified verification of vote totals.

Bernie, you had no business meeting with Obama, whose only aim is to see a Democrat president. You’re an Independent, for God’s sake; why back incorrigible criminal Democrats?

Given that you would not even stand up for yourself when it was the most important thing to do, no one will stand up for you, or stand by you. Especially as you now segue over to the enemy camp, what good can possibly come out of such a glaring betrayal — betrayal of your platform, your principles, your ethics, your politics? Clearly, going over to the other side represents a profound violation of everything you stand for.

Your flipping over to the enemy camp — enemy of the American people, mind you — is quite horrific at best, nefarious at worst. Some of us are worried that your campaign was just a sham to galvanize, and then corral, the progressives and liberals so that they could be conscripted to march right into the Clinton camp.

Prove us wrong and make a public announcement immediately that you will NOT support Hillary—EVER! so that you can regain our trust in you.

You can't abandon your supporters in a day, and then proceed to join the NWO perpetual war party under Clinton?!?! Something is very, VERY wrong here, Bernie. Your loyal Supporters Will NEVER Follow you to Hillary’s side … NEVER!

Donald Trump may not be perfectly aligned with your principles or politics, but he didn’t blatantly cheat you out of a nomination. He didn’t send thugs into your events to disrupt them or incessantly manipulate the primary process against you—state-by-state. Trump didn’t conspire with the DNC Chair to undermine your candidacy and sabotage your campaign at every turn. Nor did he attempt to marginalize you within the party whenever you exhibited vulnerability. Hillary Clinton did do all that … and much, much more that you aren’t even aware of.

Prove us wrong and make a public announcement immediately that you will NOT support Hillary—EVER! so that you can regain our trust in you.

State of the Nation
June 10, 2016

Reference
Is Bernie Sanders Merely The Pied Piper of the New World Order?
Bernie Sanders Is A Fraud: All Show and No Substance
Bernie Sanders vows to work with Hillary Clinton as Democrats move toward party unity

Eric Zuesse

On June 27th, I reported Hillary Clinton’s having privately told GMO industry lobbyists, on 25 June 2014, that the federal government should subsidize GMO firms in order to enable them to buy “insurance against risk,” and that without such federal subsidies, “this [insurance] is going to be an increasing challenge” for the industry to afford. I also reported that, in an interview she did immediately afterward with the GMO industry’s lobbying organization’s (the Biotechnology Industry Organization’s, or BIO’s) head, she compared the opponents of GMOs to the opponents of action in response to global warming; she said, in effect, that both environmental groups are ignoramuses who don’t know what scientists are saying about both the ’safety’ of GMOs and the dangers of global warming.

At the time when I wrote this news report (it was still news, even a year after the speech was given), the 15 June 2016 article in FORTUNE magazine, “Can Monsanto Save the Planet?” hadn’t yet come to my attention, but it importantly supplements the news that I had just reported, and so I now supplement the article I previously wrote on this. The FORTUNE article argued that Monsanto is the world’s champion of environmentalism, by enabling the planet to provide food to an expanding population even as the planet will be getting hotter and hotter. It said that Monsanto, and other GMO firms, are the only hope for a planet that’s burning up. The FORTUNE article also assumed, as did Hillary Clinton’s presentation to GMO lobbyists and to their chief, the equal validity of the 97% of global warming scientists who believe that human-caused global warming is real, and of the GMO-corporate-funded bio-‘scientists’ who allege that GMOs have been proven to be safe long-term for human consumption and for the environment.

Full story »

Stephen Lendman

On July 6, longtime Clinton crime family ally Attorney General Loretta Lynch unsurprisingly made if official.

Following FBI director James Comey’s failure to acknowledge Hillary’s email criminality serious enough to send ordinary people to prison, she issued a statement, saying:

“I received and accepted their unanimous recommendation that the thorough, year-long investigation be closed and that no charges be brought against any individuals within the scope of the investigation.”

Hillary is home free - except in the court of public opinion and to what extent Trump and other Republicans intend making her criminality and untrustworthiness major campaign issues. Much exists to exploit.

For now, she and husband Bill remain unaccountable for high crimes against peace, supporting predatory capitalism and neoliberal harshness harming millions, as well as racketeering through their Clinton Foundation - using it as a money-laundering, influence-peddling, self-enrichment racket, besides serious Hillary email security breaches.

Full story »

Gilad Atzmon

Now that Jewish domination of the Labour Party has been clearly established, Jewish power is no longer a vague or mysterious concept. We should listen to the words of a few of the prime Elder Jewish oligarchs and learn from them about the future of the Labour party and its political role.

The following videos were not forged by a Russian Tsar. They are believed to be authentic documentations of Jewish Labour donors and peers.

Sugar Man

Elder oligarch Lord Sugar doesn’t like the current state of the Labour Party. He wants the party to rid itself of left legend Ken Livingstone for relating the historical truth about the intensive collaboration between the Zionists and Hitler.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeaWfaXszms

Ultra capitalist Sugar (the UK’s Trump) further insists that working class Ken Livingstone “shouldn’t be allowed near” the party of Britain’s working people. In the past we tended to believe that the Labour party cared for the working class and was willing to oppose the interests of capital. The following videos suggest the contrary. Our Labour party is working hard to appease a bunch of Jewish donors.

Full story »

Stephen Lendman

The UN’s annual List of Shame is supposed to blacklist countries and groups “engage(d) in the recruitment and use of children, sexual violence against children, the killing and maiming of children, attacks on schools and/or hospitals and attacks or threats of attacks against protected personnel, and the abduction of children."

It consistently fails the test of fairness. Syria’s freedom-fighting military was disgracefully blacklisted - courageously combating US-supported terrorists, imported from scores of foreign countries. No nations more demand blacklisting than America, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, along with their rogue allies.

Full story »

Michael Collins

FBI Director James Comey’s recommendation against indicting Hillary Clinton is truly a nonevent. In the big picture, it means very little and signifies nothing new. Clinton indictment or not, the money dominated, corrupt, and violent system survives. (Image)

What if Clinton had been indicted?

Had Clinton been charged, that would have been the end of her campaign. All of the zombie Democrats led by their degenerate Hollywood champions could not have put her back together again.

Would we have felt the Bern?

The Sanders campaign lost its luster and claim to integrity when Sanders quietly admitted he would vote for Hillary.

How do you maintain your integrity while voting for the former Secretary of State responsible for 250,000 dead Syrian people in a war she helped start?

How do you maintain you’re leading a movement when you promise your vote to someone who knew or should have known she was breaking Federal law in the way she handled highly sensitive information?

Pages: 1· 2

Eric Zuesse

This news-report consists of a compilation of accounts that Crimeans have given to human rights groups or directly posted to the internet, regarding their experiences when the freely elected President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, who had received 75% of the votes of Crimeans, was violently overthrown during January and February of 2014.

On 20 February 2014, eight busloads of people from Crimea, who had come into Ukraine’s capital Kiev and were holding signs there demonstrating in opposition to the “Maidan” movement, which was seeking to oust Yanukovych, were violently attacked by “Right Sector” people who were leading the Maidan movement; and those terrified Crimeans then scrambled back into their buses, which promptly sped southward, toward home in Crimea.

Full story »

Stephen Lendman

Call it the sour grapes crowd. When things don’t turn out its way, it demands another go, hoping for a different result.

Britain’s government responds to all petitions getting at least 100,000 signatures. Parliament debates them, generally a pro forma process, most often accomplishing nothing.

London’s Guardian said second referendum petitioners attracted over 1.5 million signatures by Saturday afternoon, an “unprecedented demand temporarily crash(ing) the (House of Commons) website.” It states: “We the undersigned call upon HM government to implement a rule that if the remain or leave vote is less than 60% based on a turnout less than 75%, there should be another referendum.”

Full story »

Gilad Atzmon

“With Brexit, Israel Loses a Major Asset in the European Union,” Haaretz reports today.

“Britain helped moderate and balance EU decisions about the peace process, blunt criticism and even harness the member states against anti-Israel moves at the UN; voices sympathetic to the Palestinian cause could now become more dominant.”

The Israelis have started to recognize that the Jewish State: “has lost a significant asset in the European Union…, Britain leaving would not serve Israeli interests, especially on the Palestinian issue.” But why was Britain an Israeli asset? How was Britain reduced to act as an Israeli colony? Simple. British foreign affairs are dominated by the Jewish Lobby.

Full story »