| « False Flags: An American Tradition | In Death Osama bin Laden Causes Another War » |
Question 5 for 9/11 Smarties: What would be the explanation for the damage or lack of damage to WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 on September 11, 2001?
By Elizabeth Young
911 is without a doubt the most written about, analyzed and discussed conspiracy in the history of mankind.
Yes, even the official story, “Nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, is a conspiracy between Osama Bin Laden (who isn’t even wanted by the FBI [1q]) and the Arab terrorists whom the U.S. government claims hijacked planes and crashed them in to important buildings in the N.E. sector in the United States [because they “hate our freedoms”].
“Conspiracy” is a REAL word for a REAL act that has existed in human societies in all cultures throughout human history. If conspiracies did not exist, we would not have a word for it. The problem that we face today is that the US Government has arrogated to itself a singular role as a political pontificate that believes that it and its agents in the Justice Department, alone, constitute the only “person” (corporate person) on this Earth who is allowed to use the word “conspiracy” as it employs the charge of “conspiracy” every week in trials to put both guilty and innocent people in jail while deriding and discrediting all others who employ the word as “conspiracy theorists.” Paris Flammonde [2q]
There are inside, outside and even an inside-outside-space conspiracy theory about what really happened on 911.
Test your knowledge of the September 11, 2001 stories. See if you can spot the Terrorist Job (the story), The Inside Job (Global Domination) (the story behind the story), The Exotic Weapon story (another story behind the story) or The Metaphysical story (the story behind the story behind the story behind the story!).
Question 5. What would be (is) the explanation for the damage or lack of damage to WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 and the surrounding structures (Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5, 6, and a cylindrical arc into Bankers Trust. However, there was no damage to the Verizon building or the US post office)? [8q]
Option 1 - When kerosene (jet fuel) takes on the qualities of an explosive demolition agent it doesn’t affect the surrounding structures.
Option 2 - The damage to the surrounding structures could never have been caused by Thermite/thermate/superthermate which may explain why on September 18, 2010 the CIA admitted “we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on ‘controlled demolition’ any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters.” Inexplicably, in the same breath, the CIA goes on to Muddle Up (an advanced cover up) and blames the “collapse” on a DEW or a mini-nuke.
Option 3 - Line of sight. If the DEW was fired at WTC 7 from ground level that would explain why WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust would be in the line of sight and the Verizon building and the US post office would not. [8q]
Pictures of Mini Nukes at PakAlert Prove 9-11 was a Metaphysical Catechism (Test)
No feedback yet
