« The Looming Foreclosure Crisis: As the Fed Runs Out of Bullets, Local Governments Are Stepping InPositive Thoughts on Dark Times »

The Most Powerful Person in a Child Custody Case Isn't the Judge

July 6th, 2014

by MCMoewe

Courts in the U.S. have sentenced thousands of children to live with a parent who abused them. The family court judges who reach this decision — and restrict or end the relationship of the parent who reported concerns of abuse — usually do so based on the opinion of a court-appointed expert.

A quick look at how the family courts' multimillion-dollar expert industry operates reveals a system that is built to invite corruption.

The experts are paid thousands of dollars by one or both parents, facts on how their opinions were formed are forbidden to be reviewed by the public and state laws help shield these decision makers from potential lawsuits.

Judges appoint court experts, such as custody evaluators or guardians ad litem, to investigate and make recommendations about what is in the best interest of the child.

"The court follows the recommendations in the evaluation in over 90 percent of custody cases," according to Lawfirms.com.

As an investigative reporter, I have been collecting cases for years where an expert has determined that the alleged abuse of a child is not happening and, instead, the child or parent who fears abuse is the danger. The child is placed in the sole custody of the accused abuser, the protective parent is put on supervised visitation — or forbidden from seeing the child at all — and restrictions are placed barring other child welfare professionals from even talking to the child.

Custody cases are rarely written about in the media, but the Naples News wrote a story in 2011 about a family court judge who followed the advice of two court experts, giving a father who was then facing child abuse charges sole custody and restricting the mother, who feared for the child's safety, to supervised visitation.

In all the cases I have reviewed, I have yet to read about a single judge who has rejected the advice of their court-appointed expert.

The custody evaluation, a report that explains how these powerful expert opinions were decided, are sealed to protect the privacy of the family. Although the parents have likely paid thousands of dollars for an evaluation, often even they are not allowed to obtain a copy. If they want to see it, they must do so in their attorney's office.

"Therapeutic jurisprudence in the family courts ... substitutes the opinions of mental health practitioners for traditional evidence and decision-making procedures," according to the Liz Library, a website that has amassed years of research on the issue and advocates for courts to go back to attorneys presenting the facts and testimony to the judges, who make rulings based on those public facts.

While the process of court experts' decisions is murky, the financial toll on families is clear. Connecticut is developing a legislative reform that will prevent these experts from charging the common fee of $300 to $400 per hour. One father in the state said he paid $30,000 to a child guardian and was never clear what the expert was actually doing.

The Seattle forensic psychologist Stuart A. Greenberg helped build the multimillion-dollar court expert industry of today.

In 2007, Greenberg committed suicide after being arrested for secretly filming people in his office bathroom. If his staff had not become suspicious of an air purifier, Greenberg would probably still be commanding $450 an hour to determine what's best for children in custody cases. He was a well-respected past president of the American Board of Forensic Psychology, helped develop a national certification exam for his field and taught training classes to other experts.

His impact is still felt today by families nationwide. When I read documents from a custody case, it is common to find that Greenberg's 30-page Parenting History Survey was used to help evaluate the family.

When the arrest brought Greenberg's character and judgment into question, there was no way the Seattle Times or any other media organization could go back and review the evaluations he made that decided custody for hundreds of children. Unlike a judge's ruling, they are not public records. The Times observed, "The court doesn't keep count of cases assigned to a particular parenting evaluator, so it's impossible to tell how many families could be affected. But it's a given that all of Greenberg's pending cases will have to be reassigned to other evaluators -- a process that was already under way since his arrest and suspension of his license to practice psychology."

States also pass laws that shield these court-appointed experts from lawsuits. Often parents first have to petition the court for a second evaluator, a pricy prospect if granted, and only then do they have the right to sue. In Florida, the law once required a psychologist to follow the American Psychological Association's guidelines for custody evaluations. In 2008, lawmakers took out that requirement and the law now simply states that a psychologist must use standards of a reasonable psychologist. It offers no guidance about what is considered reasonable.

Another troubling trend I've noticed in these cases is that the family court experts often get the judges to restrict who can speak to the child. This isolates the child from anyone who might not agree with the expert. In a case this year, the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) had received a hotline complaint about potential abuse. When DCF went to the home, the custodial parent simply showed the investigators a family court order stipulating that only the two court psychological experts had the right to talk to the child.

The DCF investigator left without speaking to the girl.

This is the second in a series of articles about the treatment of abused children in the U.S. family court system. M.C. Moewe is a former criminal justice and investigative reporter for several newspapers with a B.A. in journalism from the University of North Texas. Email m AT moewe.com or use this link.

More articles on the abuse and unbridled violence against against our children.

Illinois and Virginia CPS' Conspire to Steal and Sex Traffic ...www.dcclothesline.com/.../illinois-virginia-cps-conspire-steal-sex-traffic-...May 17, 2014 - Illinois and Virginia CPS' Conspire to Steal and Sex Traffic Children ... of Virginia Child Protective Services is sex-trafficking in children that it .
California Family Courts Helping Pedophiles, Batterers Get ... www.sfweekly.com/.../family-court-parental-alienation-syndr... SF Weekly
by Peter Jamison - Mar 2, 2011 - Rex Anderson (left) and Henry “Bud” Parson were both convicted of child molestation after family courts awarded them custody of their ...

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Copyright © 2025 National Endowment for Democracy Artificial Intelligence has become autocrats’ newest tool for surveilling, targeting, and crushing dissent. Activists must learn how to harness it in the fight for freedom. By Albert Cevallos     Online…
  • By David Swanson The Alien and Sedition Acts were laws created in 1798 to carve out exceptions to the 1791 Bill of Rights, by banning statements against the government, making it harder to become a citizen, allowing the imprisonment and deportation of…
  • A prophetic reckoning: As biblical Revelations unfold in real time, the American taxpayer bankrolls bloodletting in Gaza (2023–2025), while the nation scrolls in silence. Ned Lud Code, Consent, and Carnage. A Manifesto in the Shadow of Revelation…
  • By Mark Aurelius Trump calls Harvard ‘a joke’ while threatening funds https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5251335-trump-harvard-funding-joke/ ““Harvard is a JOKE, teaches Hate and Stupidity, and should not longer receive Federal Funds,” Trump wrote…
  • “In the epoch of noise, silence is treason.” Cathy Smith’s exposé reveals how the mainstream media systematically buries truths about corporate corruption, war profiteering, and the commodification of truth itself. By Cathy Smith Welcome to the Desert…
  • By Tracy Turner Behind the wholesome facade of your local grocery store lies a cocktail of banned chemicals, deceptive labels, and global food fraud. Safeway. Albertsons. Vons. Trader Joe's. Aldi. These household names conjure an image of bustling…
  • Bilderberg Meeting Attendees (1954–Present): Inside the Secretive Annual Gathering of World Leaders, CEOs, and Influencers Shaping Global Policy and Economic Strategy. Chapter One: The Lords of War and Waste By Ned Lud It begins not with a bang but with…
  • Ned Lud dedicates this to Mark Aurelius Netanyahu: The Prime Minister of Permanent Emergency The Godless Horseman: War Eternal, Peace Never He doesn’t ride in on a white horse—he arrives in Merkava armor, draped in Holocaust memory and wrapped in the…
  • by Janet Campbell Image via Freepik Children on the margins rarely have the luxury of being heard. Their needs are either diluted in policy debates or romanticized in feel-good campaigns that vanish as quickly as they arrive. But improving the lives of…
  • By David Swanson Late last century I figured out that I needed to work on a job dedicated to making the world a better place. I know not everyone can find such a job if they try. I appreciate all the other useful jobs that millions of people do — if not…
April 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

  XML Feeds

Social CMS software
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi