A complex web of covert activities that have shaped global politics

By Tracy Turner

NATO America Project Paperclip bifurcation control relations international influence dominance power global MKUltra hegemonism.

Bifurcated America after the Civil War was indeed reborn as FBI CoIntelPro and OSS/CIA Project Paperclip - both Programs were and still are America's dark, illegal, bifurcated underbelly. If you don't think CoIntelPro does not affect you today in 2024, go to your Pod Cast, Car Radio, Web News or Cable TV and get your daily dose of Pro and Contra LGBTQ+ divisive brainwashing. All media in and around America is intentionally designed to not just divide you from me and vice versa, but to divide you within from you. Your daily dose keeps you too divided and too confused to realize, the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Intelligence has monitored all your keystrokes for the last 29 years. Your right-brain and left-brain hemispheres are bifurcated daily by FedGov.gov, using your tax dollars to do so. CoIntelPro, Mother Expletive!

There has been a noticeable trend towards bifurcation within America and NATO in recent years. This phenomenon is characterized by a growing divide between different factions or groups within these entities, leading to increased polarization and discord.

Expansionist Tendencies Fueling Bifurcation

One key driver behind this bifurcating trend is the rise of expansionist ideologies within specific segments of American and NATO societies. These groups advocate aggressive policies that seek to assert dominance and control over various regions, often at the expense of diplomatic relations and international cooperation.

Challenges to Hegemony

The concept of bifurcation poses a significant challenge to the traditional notions of hegemony within America and NATO. As different factions vie for power and influence, the once-unified fronts begin to fracture, weakening their overall ability to project pseudo-world dominance on the global stage.

Impact on International Relations

The growing bifurcation between America and NATO has far-reaching implications for international relations. It undermines the cohesion and unity these entities have historically represented, making it increasingly difficult to present a united front in addressing global challenges.

As this trend continues to unfold, it raises crucial questions about the future direction of both America and NATO and their roles in shaping the geopolitical landscape.

Bifurcating America and NATO: A Shift in Global Dynamics

In recent years, there has been a noticeable trend towards the bifurcation of America and NATO, signaling a significant shift in global dynamics. This divergence is not merely a result of political differences but also reflects deeper ideological and strategic realignments on the world stage.

Supremacy vs. Dominance: The Battle for Influence

The concept of supremacy versus dominance has become increasingly relevant in discussions surrounding the bifurcation of America and NATO. While supremacy implies a position of ultimate power or authority, dominance suggests control or influence over others. These terms are often used in international relations to describe the power dynamics between nations and alliances.

Hegemonism and Hegemony: Struggles for Control

Hegemonism refers to seeking to establish or maintain hegemony, which is the leadership or dominance of one state or group over others. This pursuit of hegemony can lead to hegemonism, characterized by aggressive or coercive tactics to assert control over other nations. The rise of hegemons and hegemonist ideologies within America and NATO has contributed to tensions within these alliances.

Imperialism and Expansionism: Quests for Power

Imperialism involves extending a nation's power through territorial acquisition or political control, often driven by economic interests. On the other hand, expansionism refers to the policy of expanding a country's territory or influence. These practices are manifestations of dominancy and hegemonic ambitions within America and NATO.

Monopolism: The Pursuit of Unilateral Control

Monopolism denotes the desire to establish a monopoly or exclusive control over a particular market or resource. In international relations, monopolistic tendencies can lead to conflicts over access to critical strategic assets or regions. The emergence of monopolist agendas within America and NATO has further fueled divisions within these alliances. In conclusion, the bifurcation of America and NATO reflects a broader trend toward shifting power dynamics in global politics. As competing visions of supremacy, dominance, hegemonism, imperialism, expansionism, and monopolism emerge, it is essential for policymakers to navigate these complex challenges with caution and foresight.

The end of America, the World's Only Superpower - U.S. Military Contractors Monopoly and "$10,000 Nuts-and-Bolts"

In U.S. military contracting, a concerning issue that has garnered attention is the existence of monopolies held by specific contractors. This monopoly arises when a limited number of companies have a stronghold on providing goods or services to the military, leading to reduced competition and potentially inflated prices. One infamous example that symbolizes this problem is the concept of "$10,000 nuts-and-bolts," where mundane items like nuts and bolts are sold to the military at exorbitant prices due to a lack of competitive bidding and oversight. These practices strain the military budget and raise ethical concerns about profiteering at the expense of taxpayers and national security.

The Birth of NATO and the Influence of Project Paperclip

After World War II, the World's geopolitical landscape was vastly altered by war, leading to the emergence of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) as a collective defense alliance. Project Paperclip played a crucial role in shaping the early foundations of NATO. Following the war's end, the United States and the Soviet Union sought to gain an advantage by recruiting German scientists, engineers, and technicians through Project Paperclip. These individuals were involved in various fields, including rocketry, aerospace engineering, and biological warfare research.

Influence of MKULTRA on NATO's Development

MKULTRA was a covert CIA program that aimed to explore the possibilities of mind control through various unethical experiments on human subjects. The revelations about MKULTRA shed light on the extent to which intelligence agencies were willing to go in pursuit of their objectives. The implications of MKULTRA extended beyond national borders and had far-reaching consequences for international relations.

MKNAOMI, MKCHAOS, Project Monarch, Bluebird, and Artichoke: NATO's Bifurcated "Bedrock"

MKNAOMI was a successor project to MKULTRA that focused on biological warfare capabilities. MKCHAOS involved domestic surveillance operations targeting anti-war activists during the Vietnam War. Projects Monarch, Bluebird, and Artichoke delved into areas such as behavioral modification, interrogation techniques, and psychological warfare.

These operations and projects collectively form a dark NATO underbelly that is NATO's shameful history. While NATO officially stands for collective security and defense cooperation among member states, these covert operations highlight a different aspect of its activities. The influence of these black projects on NATO's formation makes NATO a foe of dissidents, activists, ecologists, et al., as they reflect a complex web of covert activities that have shaped global politics in ways that are not always transparent or ethical.

The birth of NATO during Project Paperclip marked a pivotal moment in history. Alliances were forged amidst the shadows of covert operations like MKULTRA, MKNAOMI, MKCHAOS, Project Monarch, Bluebird, and Artichoke. These projects serve as a bifurcated "bedrock" for NATO's evolution, showcasing a dual nature where public-facing diplomacy coexists with clandestine activities that have had profound implications for international relations.

The U.S. Federal Government continues to run various covert programs under new names, evolving from historical operations like Paperclip, Camelot, and M.K. Ultra. These NATO/Tech Complex black operations are run by the (former) OSS, (current) CIA, NSA, FBI, DoJ, Homeland Security, Department of the Navy, and Air Force Cyber Command Wing. The U.S. government is in a state of failure compared to Rome and Pompeii in terms of its decline. Social media discrediting of whistleblowers is an attempt to extend the government's lifespan for continued profit-taking. FBI's Cointelpro is an ongoing operation rather than a historical one. NATO uses synthetic telepathy and non-lethal weapons used for 'law enforcement' on U.S. Citizens. Don’t look at the disappearances in America, just let Fox and CNN bifurcate you, FedGov CoIntelPro 2024.

Yes, Senator. No, Senator. Senator, if I understand you correctly, One Percent of the Planet are genetic Zionists, and another One Percent are El Gee Bee Tee Queues Plus, and that the other Ninety Eight Percent of Us should love being ruled and cancelled by the two percent of “us?” This is the essence of our de-mock-crazy and all of us should just bifurcate ourselves?

Sources:

BBC News
The Guardian
Der Spiegel
Al Jazeera
Middle East Monitor
Press TV
Der Spiegel
The Guardian
Le Monde
U.S. Government Black Projects and Operations

-###-

By Tracy Turner