Pages: << 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 1328 >>
Editor thepeoplesvoice.org
Nobody is talking about how this happened and why this happened, who is responsible and who caused it.
Some are blaming the slow response of the police. It was five minutes after rally attendees brought the sniper to the attention of police before they reacted. Others say it was the fault of the Secret Service sharpshooters because they allowed the assassin to squeeze off seven rounds before they shot him. Those were certainly contributing factors to a near fatal tragedy, but was that the cause? No, that was simply the chain of events that took place.
The unbridled and incendiary left-wing propaganda from the globalist media caused this. It happened because of the twenty-four-seven lies spewed by the leftist talking heads. As Americans, we must ask: Who controls the globalist media, and who pays these people to do what they do? Why is there no punishment, no retribution for their dangerous incendiary words? They incite hatred and division and caused this event. We all possess constitutional First Amendment freedom of speech rights, but nobody has the right to suggest assassination and murder.
By Vladislav B. Sotirovic
It is of extreme importance to understand the concept and motivation of soft power by China – the most rising emerging market power today and already the first export nation with the second-largest economy in the world.
Concerning China and its foreign policy, soft power is one of the most frequently used political and social concepts during the last two decades. It has to be immediately noticed that one of the major reasons for China’s easy acceptance of soft power is that soft use of power has historically a strong cultural foundation in traditional Chinese foreign policy (for instance, in the case of the Korean Peninsula). Traditional China has a rich military-free culture, which mostly contributes to China’s use of cultural power in its foreign relations.1 The revival of material and cultural power prompts China to easily find an echo in the concept of soft power. As a matter of fact, all ethnic Chinese people are proud of their cultural history.
Given that soft power is highly related to culture, it can be said that it is natural that China should stress the importance and use of cultural and soft power concerning its competitive cultural advantage in international society. Additionally, for most Chinese political and economic elites, the factor of civilization is playing a key role in shaping the future global order of world politics. In other words, in the eye of the Chinese elite, the way civilizations shape world order is not through clashes, as Samuel P. Huntington claims (a theory of Clash of Civilizations), but through dialogue between them. Such belief in civilization as well as is reinforcing the Chinese emphasis on soft power. Another reason for this is that Chinese society is fundamentally a relation-based society. This means, practically that social power is originating mostly, but not entirely, from the density of relational networks. Social power should be used for strengthening rather than disrupting the balance of social relations. Such a particular understanding of power is as well as consistent with the nature of soft power.
Editor thepeoplesvoice.org
Biden, the senile corrupt pathological liar and the treasonous Marxist democrats lead America and the world to war.
The Marxist democrat plan to use the votes of illegal aliens to rig the election has encountered a serious setback. The House has passed the Republican-led Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act by a 221-198 vote. Now Voters will be required to prove their citizenship in order to vote in the upcoming presidential election and all future federal elections.
Although democrats have millions of falsified paper ballots, rigged voting machines, and 30% of Americans believe the globalist media lies and support Biden, that will not be enough to insure a democrat victory. They cannot win without the votes of some forty million illegal aliens.
After Biden's speech to the NATO members, it appears that he wants to start a war with Russia. If Biden can embroil the United States in a war with Russia he can invoke the War Powers Act, cancel the election and remain in power indefinitely.
Peace Instead of NATO
Speech by Sevim Dagdelen, Member of the German Bundestag at
„No to NATO – Yes to Peace“-rally in Washington DC on July 7th 2024.
As NATO marks its 75th anniversary on the eve of its Washington summit, three of its great myths are unravelling.
First myth: That NATO is a defensive alliance abiding by international law.
In reality, over the last quarter century, NATO has waged unprovoked, illegal wars of aggression against Yugoslavia and Libya; and the United States, the leader of the alliance, invaded and occupied Iraq, in a catastrophic adventure – to name three notorious examples.
Second myth: That NATO stands for democracy and the rule of law.
The reality is that NATO has never had a problem with counting military dictatorships or fascist regimes among its members. Portugal, one of NATO’s founding members, murdered thousands of Africans in its colonial wars and tortured hundreds to death in concentration camps. That was never a problem for this particular collective of shared values, just as Erdoğan’s Türkiye, with its support for jihadists terrorist groups in Syria, poses no particular ethical problem for it today.
By Tracy Turner
Project Paperclip, a significant and secretive program initiated by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and later taken over by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) following World War II, is crucial in history. The objective was to recruit German scientists with military and technological research expertise to assist the United States' post-war efforts. Many of these scientists were former members of the Nazi Party and orchestrated unethical and illegal research, including experiments on human subjects.
The implications of Project Paperclip extend beyond its original purpose, as it laid the foundation for future black ops projects. The CIA's collaboration with these scientists contributed to the development of advanced surveillance techniques, mind control programs, and psychological warfare methods.
The Darker Side of Surveillance: MKUltra
MKUltra, a CIA mind control program that emerged from the same environment that produced Project Paperclip, was a stark example of unethical conduct. The project aimed to manipulate human behavior using drugs, hypnosis, and psychological torture. MKUltra remains classified; it is common knowledge that the project involved unethical experimentation on civilian and military populations without consent or knowledge.
By Alain ROUY, Le Mouvement de la Paix (France)
I’d like to give you a French voice on NATO: in France, NATO has never been very popular, because the USA, which dominates this military alliance, respects neither the diplomatic nor the military autonomy of its member states. That’s why, in 1966, the President of the French Republic, General de Gaulle, decided to withdraw France from the integrated military structures and to close the US military bases in France. De Gaulle did not dispute the existence of the Atlantic Alliance, and had always been a loyal ally of the United States in times of East-West crisis. But he contested the determining weight of the USA in the integrated military command, at the service of the American policy of hegemony. De Gaulle was opposed to bloc politics, refusing to alienate member states to the will and interests of the United States. Other French presidents have also opposed NATO’s orientations: President François Mitterrand contested the American conception of global security assured by NATO, and questioned NATO’s role after the end of the USSR; President Jacques Chirac criticized NATO’s evolution towards a broader alliance engaged in military interventions, a NATO that presents itself in Kosovo or Afghanistan as a kind of “armed arm of the UN”, which France rejects. Logically, in 2003, Chirac announced that he would veto any UN resolution authorizing war against Iraq.
By David Swanson
No NATO – Yes Peace Counter Summit
Four Parts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=1Gk-_JGVTL8
https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=3NcrlO0PsIQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=5QyJgvRjVXo
By David Swanson
The NATO of the popular imagination is an assembly of representatives of democratic nations who commit to making the world more peaceful, including by militarily defending each other if one of them is attacked. There could hardly exist a more grave collection of lies. NATO is in fact an institution devoted primarily to the increased sale of weaponry to governments of every type — neither its members nor its often openly dictatorial partners acting at the bidding of any populace — and devoted secondarily to doing the will of one government, that based here in Washington, D.C., which is represented by over 900 military bases outside its borders. NATO’s wars have never involved defending one of its members from a foreign invasion. Only once ever has NATO even claimed to be calling its members to collective defense, and that was for the idiotic, mass-murderous, environmentally catastrophic, counter-productive on its own terms, 20-year war on the distant, impoverished nation of Afghanistan, waged principally for U.S. political reasons following terrorist attacks — even though terrorist attacks have not been used as a justification for NATO wars when they have happened in any other NATO member country — and waged by NATO only following the individual U.S. attack on Afghanistan that overthrew a government made up of people who, with a few tweaks, would have fit in well a couple of blocks from here on the U.S. Supreme Court. Every other NATO war has lacked even the ridiculous pretense of defensiveness, and often even any agreement among NATO members, so that one could debate what has or has not been a NATO war, were one to ignore the fact that the staff and infrastructure of NATO have been used to launch, continue, or escalate the wars on Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, and Gaza. Not a single one of these has been legal — neither before nor during NATO involvement. NATO has no power to legalize anything. Even the NATO of popular imagination would be a criminal enterprise even during a war of popular imagination involving an angelically innocent nation invaded out of the blue by subhuman monsters. There is nothing in the UN Charter about good Samaritan mass-murder machines joining in an authorized war. There is much in actual human history to suggest the value of negotiation, diplomacy, demilitarization, unarmed civilian defense, and an actual law-based order, and to suggest that these alternatives are damaged by heavy investment in institutions dedicated to the structures and the cultures that drive weapons sales.
Editor thepeoplesvoice.org
The Yellowstone eruption will be immediately followed by the meltdown of numerous nuclear power plants.
More people in America are waking up and realizing that Biden and the democrats are destroying their country. Sadly, the democrats still have the support of some 30% of Americans who believe the lies told by CNN, MSNBC, and Google. Millions of Americans want the corrupt and treasonous democrats to lead them. They like paying twice as much for food, gasoline, and rent. They want their children to be indoctrinated into transvestitism, homosexuality, and Marxism by leftist public school teachers. They want tens of millions of illegals pouring into their country. Biden or some other corrupt democrat will be installed as president in yet another rigged election, with the globalist media talking heads singing their phony praises all the way.
America was overthrown in 1913 by the global elite banking families and has been ruled by them and the criminal corporate elite since that date. A small group of trillionaires, generational criminals, see the American people as ignorant slaves to be culled, exploited, and euthanized. The wealthy feel only contempt and loathing toward humanity, exterminating them with environmental toxins, poison food, cancer-causing fluoridated water, and poison vaccines. American farmland is constantly sprayed and poisoned with millions of tons of aluminum, barium, toxic heavy metals, polymers, and graphene. American cities are chem trailed periodically with manufactured viruses to kill off the weak. The global elite use every method at their disposal to eliminate the American people. Their tools of repression are the propaganda media, big tech, and corrupt politicians.
The global elite have used endless wars for over a hundred years to depopulate the earth, generate trillions in profits, and enslave the American people. The elite loan their puppet governments trillions of dollars printed by their bank, the Federal Reserve, at interest, to purchase the weapons of war manufactured by their military industrial complex, to prosecute their wars. American cities have fallen into disrepair while millions of Americans are homeless, hungry, and out of work. Instead of helping the American people with a couple of billion dollars, puppet politicians send hundreds of billions of dollars borrowed from the Federal Reserve Bank to Ukraine for yet another regime change war. Democrats and Rhino Republicans serve their global elite masters, hastening the economic collapse of America while keeping the American people in debt bondage.
By David Swanson
“Despite the fact that deterrence remains an article of faith among the ‘realists’ who have orchestrated U.S. strategic policy and who continue to do so, despite its incoherence and instability, much of this faith is lip service only, analogous to deeply religious individuals who profess belief in heaven, yet rarely rejoice when a loved one dies. Thus, if the U.S. government really believed in nuclear deterrence — or in the billions of dollars spent on Ballistic Missile Defense — there wouldn’t be such hyperventilating about the threat posed by a nuclear armed North Korea or possibly by Iran in the future.” —David Barash
There’s a webinar coming up on July 9 about nuclear deterrence. I imagine it will be excellent. I’ve also just been reading a fantastic book on the topic called Threats: Intimidation and Its Discontents by David P. Barash. There’s an online book club with the author and free copy of the book coming up for that. Barash’s central thesis is that the idea of nuclear deterrence makes no sense. It’s kind of hard to see why anyone would argue with him.