By Robert Singer

[From Mother Jones ‘Rip the baby out of the womb': What Donald Trump got wrong about abortion in America]

During the final presidential debate Wednesday, Donald Trump blasted Hillary Clinton’s stance on abortion, employing graphic language to describe the late-term procedures he argued his opponent would allow.

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby,” Trump said.

“That is not what happens in these cases,” Clinton replied. “And using that kind of scare rhetoric is just terribly unfortunate.” Political rhetoric aside, Trump displayed a misunderstanding of how abortion works in the United States. [End of 'Rip the baby out of the womb' ]

But that's not what I want to say today to all the believers who are voting for Trump.

Maybe Trump won't rip babies out of the womb but Donald is about cutting (ripping) off a sick infant's health coverage that was crucial for his grandnephew, who suffered from seizures and later developed cerebral palsy.

Did you know that he gave his word that after his father's death he would continue to pay "all costs" for the sick child's care should be covered, regardless of caps on the plan or medical necessity.

[From The Trump Files: When Donald Took Revenge by Cutting Off Health Coverage for a Sick Infant]

The story begins after the death of Trump's father, Fred Sr., in 1999. As David Cay Johnston explains in his book The Making of Donald Trump, Fred Sr. had written a will after the death of his oldest son, Fred Jr., known as Freddy, in 1981. The will left the majority of Fred Sr.'s wealth to Donald and his surviving siblings. Freddy's family was largely cut out.

When Fred Sr. died, Freddy's children sued, claiming that the will "had been 'procured by fraud and undue influence' by Donald and the other surviving siblings," according to Johnston.

Johnston writes that medical insurance had consistently been provided to the family through Fred Sr.'s company. This coverage was crucial for Freddy's grandson (Donald's grandnephew), who suffered from seizures and later developed cerebral palsy. So crucial, in fact, that a letter sent from a Trump lawyer to the insurer after the patriarch's death in 1999 said that "all costs" for the sick child's care should be covered, regardless of caps on the plan or medical necessity, according to Johnston.

A week after the lawsuit was filed in court, Freddy's son (Donald's nephew) received a letter informing him that the health insurance would be discontinued, meaning his ill son would be left without coverage. Donald openly admitted to the New York Daily News that he and his siblings took this action out of revenge.

"Why should we give him medical coverage?" Trump said, adding, "They sued my father, essentially. I'm not thrilled when someone sues my father."

Thanks Mother Jones why hasn't anyone pointed out that Trump is a 21st century Hitler?

Donald Trump: Make America Hate Again | Part 1 (Documentary)

Or, why isn't anyone writing that Trump is echoing much of what Duke says? How David Duke’s (Very Live) Ghost Haunts Donald Trump The former Ku Klux Klan leader’s biographer reflects on the many similarities between two renegade campaigns.

And finally, let's hear from someone who has first hand knowledge of his alleged business "acumen." I guarantee this will convince you to DUMP TRUMP. What Trump's Golf Course Management Tells Us About How He'd Be President

Vote for Hillary to make sure he doesn't get a chance to Nuke the world.

By Robert Singer

There is something wrong with this election picture. Clinton's total amount of individual donations from U.S. cities was about $184.7 million.

Nothing in the news this morning, with less than 4 days until doomsday, suggests that the Clinton Campaign is spending bigly the last days of the campaign.

And there is nothing in the news that could sink the Trump ship.

This makes no sense, since even if you emptied all of the Trump Towers there wouldn't be enough room to store 1/2 of his political baggage. NBC's "Late Night" host Seth Meyers analyzed Americans' choice for president on Wednesday night: Voters similarly are unhappy with both candidates, with less than a week before Election Day some still are finding it hard to choose between Trump and Hillary Clinton. Speaking to those voters, Meyers wondered, on the one hand, do you pick someone who is under federal investigation for using a private email server. Or, Meyers said, do you pick someone who:

“Called Mexicans rapists
Claimed the president was born in Kenya
Proposed banning an entire religion from entering the U.S.
Mocked a disabled reporter
Said John McCain wasn’t a war hero because he was captured
Attacked the parents of a fallen war hero
Bragged about committing sexual assault
Was accused by 12 women of committing sexual assault
Said some of those women weren’t attractive enough for him to sexually assault
Said more countries should get nukes
Said he would force the military to commit war crimes
Said a judge was biased because his parents were Mexican
Said women should be punished for having abortions
Incited violence at his rallies
Called global warming a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese
Called for his opponent to be jailed
Declared bankruptcy six times
Bragged about not paying income taxes
Stiffed his contractors and employees
Lost a billion dollars in one year
Scammed customers with his fake university
Bought a 6-foot painting of himself with money from his fake foundation
Has a trial for fraud coming up in November
Insulted an opponent’s looks
Insulted an opponent’s wife’s looks
And, bragged about grabbing women by the pu**y.”

So either the Clinton organization is positive she is going to win by a landslide or Hillary is now helping Trump get elected.

I know not what course others may take, but as for me, if it's a choice between 1) a landslide for Clinton or 2) Trump is the latest puppet of the Globalists, I am getting ready for a presidential election state of emergency. Obama is going to declare martial law and he and Michelle won't be moving out of the White House.

(Washington, DC)  FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress on new evidence in the Clinton email scandal represents interference in the presidential campaign commensurate to his failure to indict candidate Hillary Clinton for crimes greater than those committed by citizens that are now serving time. His actions are a paradigm for the dysfunctional and dangerous state of the political system in the United States. (Image)

Director Comey’s letter to Congress of October 28 about “emails that appear to be pertinent in the [Clinton] investigation” was a deliberate, premeditated action that will harm Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s chances in the presidential election. His letter may have an even greater impact on Democratic Party down-ballot candidates in Senate and House races and, as a result, influence the post election balance of power in Congress.

There is no question that Comey knew that his actions would have significant political impact just days before the election. The fact that he defied established procedures of the Justice Department and instructions from superiors shows the intentional nature of his acts.

Full story »

by Stephen Lendman

A previous article explained the so-called battle for Mosul is a hoax. It’s about shifting thousands of US-supported ISIS fighters to Syria, along with perhaps letting Turkish forces move in to control evacuated areas.

In Moscow, Russian and Syrian foreign ministers expressed concern. Sergey Lavrov said Moscow will “take measures to prevent terrorists moving from Mosul to Syria with their heavy arms, which, of course, will seriously worsen the situation in the Syrian republic.”

“We think that it is important not to let this happen…We cannot let the terrorist leave Mosul (for) Syria with the aim to re-direct their activity.”

Syrian Foreign Walid al-Muallem said the US-led “coalition has never fought Daesh. On the contrary, it is destroying the infrastructure of the Syrian economy, and recently destroyed a huge number of bridges on the Euphrates River…They want to move Daesh from Mosul into Raqqa.”

Assad close political and media advisor Bouthaina Shaaban explained Washington’s dirty scheme, ignored by media scoundrels, saying redeploying ISIS fighters from Mosul to Syria would represent a “huge danger to our sovereignty, to our country.”

“Russia and Syria are looking at this issue extremely seriously. We’re not going to sit and watch…The way they encircle Mosul shows they would like these terrorists to move into to Syria…”

Full story »

Link: http://thomasdishaw.com/2016/07/abc-poll-93-say-hillary-clinton-criminally-prosecuted/

THOMAS DISHAW.COM

Today marked a sad day in Washington as crime boss Hillary Clinton has gotten away with murder again.

Unfortunately, no charges will be brought against Clinton for her passing of classified materials via her unsecured server, although 93% of Americans think Clinton should be prosecuted according to this ABC report:

Presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has been under scrutiny for almost a year after it came to light that she used a private email server for her government and personal emails, rather than the State Department’s email system while serving as Secretary of State to President Obama. She recently met with the FBI about an investigation being conducted to decide whether or not to criminally prosecute her for her actions.

Clinton has said relying on a private server was a mistake but that other secretaries of state had also used a personal email address previously.

by Stephen Lendman

In less than three weeks, get used to hearing about president-elect Hillary, she and husband Bill heading back to the White House in January for a third co-presidential term - by fair or foul means.

What’s coming should terrify everyone. She’ll largely be calling the shots this time, surrounded with likeminded neocons, war lords, recycled Wall Street crooks, and other assorted miscreants.

The most perilous time in world history is about to worsen with her as US president. Expect America’s war on humanity to escalate dramatically, perhaps striking US soil for the first time since war with Britain in 1812.

It involved land and naval battles, lasting over two-and-a-half years. British forces occupied Washington, setting public buildings ablaze, including the White House (then called the Presidential Mansion) and Capitol Hill.

It was skirmish-like compared to what’s coming if Hillary confronts Russia and China belligerently, risking possible nuclear war, turning cities like Washington to smoldering rubble if launched.

Full story »

by Stephen Lendman

Trump and Clinton represent dirty business as usual. She’s far more ruthless and dangerous, world peace threatened under her leadership, an emotionally unstable war goddess/she devil.

Jill Stein is the only people’s candidate, a true anti-war progressive, supporting democratic governance of, by and for everyone equitably - entirely absent under duopoly rule, serving privileged interests exclusively.

Hillary is ruthlessly pro-war, pro-Wall Street, pro-corporate predation, anti-democratic, anti-rule of law principles, anti-labor, anti-fundamental freedoms.

Full story »

Michael Collins

It's a beautiful day in New York.Hillary Clinton, 9/11/16

Video of Hillary Clinton leaving a 9/11-memorial ceremony in New York City establishes a clear case to question her ability to continue running for president or to serve if elected.

As Clinton was leaving the 90-minute ceremony at ground zero in lower Manhattan, the candidate waved at a small crowd and headed to her van. Look at this video from Zednek Gazda. Clinton becomes unstable. Members of her retinue take her arms to support her. She collapses and is then lifted into the van.

Clinton went to her daughter’s nearby apartment for two hours, then emerged, and tried to put a good face on it. When reporters asked about her health and how she was feeling, Clinton simply blew off the questions. Her response was, “It’s a beautiful day in New York.” (CNN)

Review the video here and draw your own conclusions. The facts of the event, her freezing up and need to be propped up, are undeniable.

Full story »

New York City Grand Jury Hands Down Indictment on 9/11
By Robert Singer

The Charges:

Plaintiff (The People of the United States) --vs-- Defendants (No CR 95-110 The Powers That Be (TPTB, a non-conspiracy acronym), Mike Rivero, a.k.a. John Wenckus) [1]

Violations: 18 USC Sec. 2332a; 18 USC Sec. 844(f); 18 USC Sec. 1114; 18 USC Sec. 1111;

This case centers on a Metaphysical Catechism (Test) of the Earth initiated (with out prior notice as required by Rule #25443) on September 11, 2001 at the electro-magnetic grid location 40° 42' 41.3852", -74° 0' 44.0064 (One World Trade Center). [2]

I N D I C T M E N T

COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to use incendiary devices to create controlled-diameter holes in metallic targets)

The Grand Jury charges:

1. On 9/6/2001 The Powers That Be (TPTB), the defendants herein, did knowingly, intentionally, willfully and maliciously conspire, combine and agree together and with others unknown to the Grand Jury to remove bomb-sniffing dogs from the World Trade Center I and II, while the defendants and their unknown agents placed AN-M14 thermite charged incendiary devices between the 92nd to 98th floors of the North Tower and between the 78th to 84th floors in the South Tower.

   The object of the conspiracy were as follows:
   - Kill and injure innocent people (1,434 in the North Tower, 589 in the South Tower).
   - Damage the property of Silverstein Properties, Inc. (Larry Silverstein suffered a net loss of 4 billion dollars). [3]
   - Generate confusion surrounding the impact holes in the towers to prevent the discovery of the test of the Earth (Count 2).

Full story »

There are so many of my articles that have been Re-Moved from the sites, the wayback machine and google that I had to investigate.

The 9/11 anniversary is tomorrow so I thought you might be interested in reading Case 4: The Most Important Issue in the History of the Univers answers the questions, 1) Why the invasion of Iraq was called off after the second tower collapsed? and 2) What the dip of the Earth’s magnetic field at the precise moment of the alleged first plane “impact” has to do with “what really happened on 9/11?” [Appendix Sandy Hook]

Proof that the following articles were in fact Re-Moved from the sites, the wayback machine and google can be found in the Appendix Cases below.

Looking at each case you realize a human was not involved. Any followup google search a human would have certainly performed would yield results that were overlooked because of a variation in the title or the author name.

Full story »