Pages: << 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 1327 >>
COVID: If there is no virus, why are people dying?
By Jon Rappoport
Since the beginning of this false pandemic, I’ve been offering compelling evidence that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists.
Then people ask, “So why are all these people dying?”
I have explained that, many times, and in this article I’ll explain it again.
First of all, the whole notion that COVID-19 is one health condition is a lie. COVID IS NOT ONE THING.
This is both the hardest and simplest point to accept and understand.
Don’t reject the existence of the virus and then say, “So what is THE cause of people dying?” There is no ONE CAUSE. There is no one illness. There is no “it.”
By far, the biggest sources of illness we are dealing with are lung conditions: various kinds of pneumonia; flu and flu-like disease; TB; other unnamed lung/respiratory problems.
THESE ARE BEING RELABELED “COVID.” It’s a repackaging scheme. People are dying for those traditional reasons, and their deaths are being called “COVID.”
Debunking the 95% Vaccine Effectiveness Rate Propaganda of the Two Experimental, Untested for Long-term Safety, mRNA-containing Covid-19 Vaccines
By Gary G. Kohls, MD
The Effectiveness of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s Covid-19 Vaccines Have Been Grossly Over-rated by Big Pharma, Big Government and Big Media
Compelling Reasons to Delay Being Inoculated with What May Turn Out to be Useless – or Worse - Vaccines
(Also Pointing Out Minnesota’s 99.6% Survival Rates Among Non-Long-term Care Facility Patients)
Question: What would any aware person think if the headlines – and the claims from the talking heads - about the two Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials had read:
“Shot Reduces COVID-19 Risk by Less Than 1%” rather than “COVID-19 Shot 95% Effective”?
The answer to the question is obvious: There would be no long lines at the vaccination centers and the level of vaccine hesitancy would rise above the current 50+% that already exists among the informed, thoughtful, propaganda-resistant population.
The coronavirus: using "animal models" as proof of infection; another lie
By Jon Rappoport
There are a number of badly informed scientists who believe current “animal models” prove SARS-CoV-2 is infectious. They’re wrong.
First of all, I’ve been demonstrating that no one has proved the virus exists. But putting that aside for the moment and assuming it does exist, for the purposes of argument only…what is an animal model?
Researchers take a group of animals and inject them with a serum which contains a purported virus. Then the researchers see whether the animals develop symptoms and (supposed) markers of the disease in question.
So far, I have only found evidence that researchers are using mice and, perhaps, another similar species for their model.
Yet they claim, because of the mice’s reactions, that, yes, the virus is infectious.
This is absurd.
The Biden-Harris Treasonous Marxist Revolution
By Kelleigh Nelson
Truth has become the new hate speech. —Pamela Geller
Truth will ultimately prevail where there are pains to bring it to light. —George Washington
Justice is truth in action. —Benjamin Disraeli
Patrick Henry said, "It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains." How true this is for America today. The dread I felt knowing that President Donald Trump handily won the 2020 election but treason and fraud cheated him out of a second term overwhelmed my spirit. Many American patriots are full of the same fear and dread knowing the Biden administration will completely destroy what President Trump accomplished in four years without the help of Republicans. And in all those years he was pilloried, lied about and hated not just by the Marxist Democrats, but by a majority of the neo-con Trotskyite Republicans as well.
COVID: If they haven’t isolated the virus, how can they make a vaccine?
By Jon Rappoport
Answer: They can’t.
“But…but, you see, we take a piece of RNA, and we inject it into the person, and the RNA forces the cells to manufacture a protein that’s very similar to a protein in SARS-CoV-2…and then the immune system swings into gear and produces antibodies to THAT protein, and THEN the person has achieved immunity from the virus…”
Sorry, no dice.
As I’ve been demonstrating for months now, there is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, “the piece of RNA” that’s injected can’t be assumed to be related to “the virus.”
Therefore, the protein which the cells produce in the body is merely CLAIMED to be similar to a protein in the unproven “SARS-CoV-2.”
There is no KNOWLEDGE here.
Your Coronavirus PCR Test is Positive – You Still Might Not Have Covid-19, Exposing Unwelcome Truths About the Deep Flaws of PCR Testing
Preface by Gary G. Kohls, MD
New York’s state lab has access to the Cycle Threshold (Ct) values from the PCR tests they process. Last July, the lab identified 872 positive tests based on a threshold of 40 cycles.
If the lab has used a cutoff of 35 cycles, 43 percent of those tests would have been considered negative. What’s more, if the cycles had been limited to 30, 63 % of the PCR-positive patients would have been justifiably been regarded as negative.
In testing data that include cycle thresholds, officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada have found that up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus. If that data was extrapolated to nation-wide statistics, the 45,000 new “cases” reported last week perhaps only 4,500 would actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing
It is obvious that PCR tests need to be interpreted with caution as they do not reflect a true viral load, infectivity or even contagiousness. In fact, many times no viable viruses can be cultured in patients with a positive PCR test result. False positive PCR tests abound, resulting in CDC statistics that have been consistently over-estimating both the incidence rates and mortality rates related to the current epidemic, thus falsely stimulating the panic seen among the many people demanding their vaccinations NOW.
David Rasnick: new strain of the coronavirus, or a giant con? How deep do the lies go?
By Jon Rappoport
David Rasnick
David Rasnick, PhD chemist, with a long history working in the pharmaceutical industry (Abbott, Prototek, Arris), broke away from official science and served as the president of Rethinking AIDS : the group for the scientific reappraisal of the HIV hypothesis. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.
Here is a recent explosive statement Rasnick made about SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. Digesting it brings about a breakthrough revelation:
“Viruses are unstable, RNA [e.g, SARS-Cov-2] viruses especially. They are so unstable, there is no such thing as an un-mutated RNA virus. They are like snow flakes, no two are identical.”
“HIV is an RNA virus with 9,800 nucleotides. You can download the HIV Sequence Compendium here:”
The Media Destroyed America
Paul Craig Roberts
It did not take long for the Lie Machine, aka American media, to create the false news and fake narrative of the “storming of the US Capitol” on January 6 by a “white supremacist insurrection.” Here is an example from Bloomberg Weekend Reading on January 23, 2021:
“The scenes from the first day of Joe Biden’s presidency unfolded against the backdrop of a devastated U.S. economy, continuing fallout from a white supremacist insurrection, and a coronavirus death toll surpassing 400,000.” *
The fake narrative is accepted everywhere. It is endemic in the world press. Even news sources such as RT and Sputnik which endeavor to give us real news instead of presstitute lies have repeated the insurrection story.
Democrats Launch Their Assault on Red State America Civil War Heats Up
Paul Craig Roberts
The opening salvo against red state America is the article of impeachment against President Trump introduced on January 11 by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democrat Representatives David Cicilline, Ted Lieu, and Jamie Raskin. So much for Biden’s promise to “unify the country.”
What is the intent of this article of impeachment? It cannot possibly be to remove Trump from office. Trump will have left office before the Senate could vote on impeachment. There is no such thing as impeaching a person who is not in office. Clearly impeachment has nothing to do with getting Trump out of office.
How does it unify the country to follow up an election believed by half of the US voting population to have been stolen with impeaching the president who is regarded as the victim of a stolen election? Adding insult to injury will only further enrage 75 million or more Trump voters, and many honest Democrats, who regard the election as stolen. If the Establishment and its Democrat, Republican, and media allies truly believe the election not to have been stolen, why wasn’t the evidence permitted to be examined so that the controversy could be settled instead of ignored? Ignoring the evidence deepens the suspicion as does labeling those who challenged the election “enemies of democracy.” Democrats are now trying to censure Republican members of the House and Senate who supported having the evidence presented to Congress. Why censure someone who wants evidence to be examined?
Criticizing What They Can’t Understand
By Gary G. Kohls, MD
Identifying the Vaccinology-Illiterates Among Us (Journalists, Talking Heads, Legislators, Lobbyists, Medical School Professors, Physicians, Internet Trolls, Parents of Vulnerable Infants, etc)
“In a multitude of ways, corporations of all types – even the marketers of dangerous products like tobacco, diet soft drinks, prescription drugs and vaccines - continue to influence and control what is heard on the radio, what is seen on the television, what journalists are allowed to report on, who is allowed to be interviewed and therefore, indirectly, what issues get discussed by the usually easily propagandized consumers of that information.”
Definitions: Vaccinology is the science of developing vaccines to theoretically (and usual imperfectly and only partially) minimize some the adverse effects of a small portion of the huge number of (essentially uncountable) infectious diseases. It is also the study of how the immune system responds to vaccine injections that always have toxic (sometimes lethal) ingredients in them. The science also includes the evaluation of immunization programs, vaccine safety and effectiveness.
