« Toothless: The Watchdog Press That Became the Government's LapdogObama's 'War on Terror' »

Israel Sought 'Politicide' Through Gaza Attack

February 12th, 2009

Saree Makdisi

In three weeks of incessant bombardment, Israel killed or injured more than 6,000 Palestinians in Gaza, most of them civilians, and a third of them children.

It pushed the territory it has militarily controlled for four decades (and for the welfare of whose population international law holds it legally accountable) even deeper into deliberately engineered, even fine-tuned, misery.

It wrecked much of what was left of Gaza's civilian infrastructure after months of siege and years of isolation from the outside world; it smashed thousands of family homes, schools, offices and mosques; it obliterated the personal property of tens of thousands of refugees -- many of whom have now lost two or three homes in succession to Israeli bombs.

Israel's primary justification for the bombardment of Gaza was that it was intended to stop Palestinian rockets fired into Israeli territory.

But Israel failed to accomplish a single one of its declared objectives. It failed to stop the firing of rockets from Gaza. It failed to stop smuggling across the Egypt-Gaza border. And it failed, even in the short run, to bring security to Israel's own population.

If anything, the bombardment of Gaza left Hamas stronger than ever, for having stood up to three weeks of bombardment and preventing the Israeli army from translating its overwhelming firepower superiority into actual accomplishments on the battlefield -- of which there were none, other than crude destruction.

Point of Attack

It left the aging leadership of Fatah -- still pleading for a return to the so-called road map to peace, which was supposed to have led to a Palestinian state four years ago -- looking more pathetic and desperately servile than ever.

What then was the point of the Israeli assault on Gaza?

The sheer scale of the violence Israel unleashed on that territory's hapless population may, in itself, provide some answer to that question, precisely because, for all its ferocity, it failed to accomplish any of its declared objectives.

Consider, then, that for three weeks Israel showered high explosives, white phosphorous and other advanced munitions from land, sea and air on the packed residential neighborhoods of one of the most densely populated areas on Earth, in sweeping disregard for the principles of international humanitarian law.

Knowing full well that the residents of those neighborhoods lack any real form of shelter, it denied them even the last desperate right normally afforded to civilians in a war zone -- the ability to flee to safety. The 1.5 million residents of Gaza were thus locked into what Israel turned into a free-fire zone, and bombarded around the clock.

Providing Answers

Consider, further, that the people who went through this bombardment were already hungry, thirsty and cold from months of deprivation caused by Israel's siege of Gaza.

Consider, also, that half of the people who suffered through all this were children.

And consider, finally, who all these people are and what they are doing in Gaza in the first place. That may provide an answer to the question.

The majority of Gaza's population consists of refugees or their descendants who were driven from the formerly multireligious, multicultural land known as Palestine, which was turned into an exclusively Jewish state in 1948.

As Muslims and Christian Palestinians, they would have outnumbered the Jewish residents -- most of them then immigrants from Europe -- of the new state that wanted to claim an exclusive Jewish identity. Had they remained, the state wouldn't have been Jewish after all. So they had to go. Were they to be allowed back to their homes now, Israel would, again, lose its claim to an exclusively Jewish character. They are, in short, regarded by Israel as an excess population.

Making Sense

Seen in that way, all the steps that Israel has taken toward this population over the years -- isolation, imprisonment, blockade, impoverishment, deprivation, denial, starvation, death and destruction -- suddenly make a kind of twisted sense.

Clearly, the aim of the bombardment of Gaza wasn't to extirpate this population. But it was intended to pound them, and all other Palestinians, into submission, to make them give up their call for self-determination and justice. It was intended to extirpate them in a symbolic sense -- a kind of politicide, to use the term coined by the Israeli sociologist Baruch Kimmerling.

And on this score, too, Israel failed.

The Palestinian people have never been more united, and never been more determined in their threefold demand: That Israel end its occupation of Palestinian land; that it end its repression of its Palestinian minority; and that it end its denial of the moral and legal right of return for those Palestinians who were removed from their homes in 1948.

Only when all three conditions are fulfilled will there be a just and lasting peace.

(Saree Makdisi is professor of English literature at the University of California, Los Angeles and author of "Palestine Inside Out: An Everyday Occupation." The opinions expressed are his own.)

-###-

By Saree Makdisi Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aGwvtY5cgquc Via: http://jnoubiyeh.blogspot.com/2009/02/israel-sought-politicide-through-gaza.html

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Cathy Smith The Myth of African Poverty Concocted by the Oligarchy The relations of the global powers to the continent, especially America, Russia, China, and Israel, have mainly been based on resource extraction, strategic economic influence, and…
  • Feminism was once a revolutionary force, a creed born out of struggle, resilience, and the dream of a world much different from what we had been given. It was born from the pain of millions of women working, poor, Black, Indigenous, women of color who refused to take the world as it was. And yet, today, feminism is an idea manipulated, diluted, commodified, and often controlled by those very forces that it initially came into being to dismantle from the military-industrial complex to corporate media giants; feminism today hardly resembles its initial mission of radical social transformation. This has happened because things are ingrained in how our media landscape rolls along. We hardly notice how forces remake feminist discourse into more palatable, consumer-friendly, and politically neutral forms. The corporations that run the media, the intelligence agencies that shape public opinion, and the political powers that remain in control have combined a grand symphony of influence that has redefined feminism, replacing its radical edges with a glittering but hollow vision of empowerment. It is time to reclaim the radical roots of feminism to inspire a new generation of activists to fight for real change.
  • Paul Craig Roberts President Trump’s economic proposals, with one exception, constitute a coherent package. I will address his proposals in a later column. Today I address his bad idea that would cause the failure of Trump’s renewal of the American…
  • Cindy Harper DeepSeek offers open-source generative AI with localized data storage but raises concerns over censorship, privacy, and disruption of Western markets. A recent regulatory clampdown in the United States on TikTok, a Chinese-owned social…
  • Fred Gransville 1) Water Monopolies: Who, When, Where, Why, and How? Water monopolies, a burgeoning threat of the 21st century, are rapidly gaining control over a resource that was once considered a public good. The scale of commercialization has surged…
  • Tracy Turner In a better world, the Arctic would be left to wolves, polar bears, seals, and whales. But not in this world, with our Robber Baron Politicians and Criminal CEOs. The Arctic, once a remote, frozen frontier, is now a hotbed of fierce…
  • Tracy Turner Abstract: The building blocks of 21st century American life, from suburban homes and lawns to gas-guzzling SUVs that clog roadways, have been rooted in excess. Today's culture of consumption controls almost every phase of our lives; excess…
  • Chris Spencer The State of Israel is an intricately interlinked part of the geopolitics of the region, largely through its special relationship with the United States, complemented by that with Russia, and now spreading toward Africa, Latin America, and…
  • By Cathy Smith God, my blade-server, encrypts my soul in the fortress of His protection, shielding me from the firewalls of fear. His commands are my protocols, sharpening my spirit like a flawless algorithm in the face of battle. Though the route of my…
  • Governor Gavin Newsom's ban on gas-powered string trimmers and leaf blowers in California is a step toward reducing emissions, but it highlights a larger issue: the growing environmental impact of gas-guzzling SUVs. While small engine reforms are positive, the SUV culture continues to drive global resource depletion, energy crises, and food insecurity…
January 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

  XML Feeds

Multiple blogs done right!
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi