Zahir Ebrahim

Who in Pakistan has not heard of the famous fable of King Solomon the wise. When presented with two women feuding over a baby, each claiming to be the real mother, the king drew his mighty sword to cut the baby in half to give to each quarrelsome woman. One of them, the real mother, cried out: “It's hers, it's hers, please give the entire beautiful baby to her, she is the real mother; I don't want half of the dead!”

Alas, on the face of it, not one among the rulers of Pakistan is the real mother of the Pakistani peoples.

Pakistan has been under the hectoring hegemons' sword the moment the Berlin Wall came down. Almost overnight, with the calculated destruction of the Soviet Union, a new perpetual enemy of mankind was brought to the fore in the continuing game of Hegelian Dialectics to raise a new phoenix of world government from the ashes of the old world order. Variously titled as militant Islam, radical Islam, islamofascism, but most often called Islamism to bring it kinship with the earlier enemies of mankind, namely, Fascism, Nazism, and Communism, though not Zionism, Pakistan has been the unrecognized eye of the storm from day one.

The only Muslim country with nuclear weapons, also harboring a ready-made psychological-tribal ethos which makes some of its inhabitants easy recruits for enabling the perpetual World War IV with just the right “tickling”, Pakistan had to be both harvested for fodder, and setup for destabilization and balkanization. The latter not primarily for the purpose which is most apparent, the riches under its soil, but to continue the path of creating World Order.

The previous four decades since the end of World War II until the dismantling of the Soviet Union, saw most of the world held hostage into two partisan camps of two combating nuclear titans. These bastions of civilization and high-morality of course only exchanged blows in proxy warfare upon poorer nations, but primarily used that Cold War as the pretext to run up a phenomenal expense on arms buildup. That was deemed World War III. The moment that ended, World War IV began right away, albeit it remained poorly recognized as such until 911. The first barbaric invasion of Iraq, followed by the 13 years of strangulation regimes of economic sanctions and silent warfare – which notably elicited the famous affirmation from the US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to the reporting of deaths of half a million Muslim children for a want of medicines “We think the price is worth it” – set the stage for it.

911 created that shock effect of “New Pearl Harbor” upon the American public to provide the full pretext to the remaining superpower left standing after World War III, to launch its final gambit to entirely overthrow the remaining Old World Order. Thus, the past one hundred and twenty years have seen four World Wars, or their preparations, and in each war, three unusual things transpired: 1) existing world order and existing empire were partially destroyed, to be replaced by a transient world order that was to be an incremental baby-step towards the ultimate agenda of world government, and repeat; 2) no territorial expansion occurred for any warring nation; 3) a private financial oligarchy continually emerged the most victorious, consolidating its gains from each war, and each economic boom-bust cycle, to grow more and more powerful. All warring nations ran up astronomical debts to these financial barons who armed all sides of the manufactured conflicts, and also controlled the monetary policy and currency-issue in each of those nations. The victors, as well as the vanquished. The war debt was administered by the Bank of International Settlement, or BIS for short. Who owns BIS and what do its owners want with world government? Was it foreseeable that Pakistan would be put on the chopping block of the war planners?

The collection of Project Humanbeingsfirst's letters and essays comprising this book examines the latter question, of the predictability of Pakistan's sorry fate. Had it not been for her own cowardly and treasonous rulers alternately cowering and thumping their chests while killing their own civilians in the most barbaric way imaginable; and for a public watching in apathy while waiting for Allah to come save them, it was a fate that was completely avoidable! Who gave the mandate to military dictator General Pervez Musharaf to ally Pakistan with the hectoring hegemons in the aftermath of 911? At Nuremberg, the rulers of Pakistan would all hang for creating and maintaining an alliance with the aggressor who committed not just war crimes, but “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” as was concluded by Justice Robert Jackson, US chief prosecuting counsel at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals. General Pervez Musharaf treated Pakistan as his private inheritance, and the same is being done by his successors, both military and civilian.

It is my hope that in presenting this volume to them, that they might suddenly recall that six feet under, the maggots can't tell the difference. While surely, the soul extractor can!

For gaining a deeper comprehension of the larger context of one-world government in which Pakistan's dismantling is situated, please acquire the “Monetary Reform Bibliography” from Project Humanbeingsfirst's website, or take the online tutorial titled: “The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death”.

These essays and letters are arranged in reverse chronological order (for the lack of a better way to present them). All pertain to Pakistan directly, except three overarching ones which are more general: 1) the letter to the Financial Times of December 11, 2008, which is included to demonstrate that when the rest of the documents refer to one-world government, it isn't a conspiracy theory of idle schizoids on some LSD trip; 2) the report of April 26, 2008, From Balance of Terror to Unilateral Terror on the Grand Chessboard, which is included to succinctly identify the fundamental political science reality behind the “war on terror”; and 3) the editorial of October 19, 2009, on the Pentagon's Fourth Generation Warfare which gives a bird's-eye view of the conspiratorial orchestration of modern history as the forensic backdrop for situating the ongoing World War IV and how to end it. It would be preferable to read these before proceeding to the predicted sorrows of Pakistan.

This Second Ebook Edition of Pakistan Decapitation Papers collects several additional reports and letters and is suitable for hardcopy pretty-printing.

Source URL for Ebook Second Edition: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/pakistan-decapitation-papers-2nd-edition-oct31-2009.pdf

Source URL for Ebook First Edition: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/pakistan-decapitation-papers-oct17-2009.pdf

Epilogue

There is many a slip between the cup and lip. Pakistan is still on the map. It is not too late to wage a genuine struggle for independence against the barbarians at the gate who call themselves the hectoring hegemons.

There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free--if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight!

I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger?

Will it be the next week, or the next year?

Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a Xe guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength but irresolution and inaction?

Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?

Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.

Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest.

There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Baluchistan to the mountains of the Tribal Belt!

The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extentuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms!

Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have?

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Once upon a time, so entreated a courageous man whom all honor in the United States of America as their founding father! But when he had spoketh, he wasn't addressing a nation of traitors, mercenaries, native-informants, 'Negroes', and a confused mass of people. The enemy was clearly identified. All he had to do was to rile them up to stand up for their dignity, and their independence.

Today, the enemy is shrouded in obfuscation for the vast majority of Pakistani people. They don't know the enemy. With each suicide bomb blast they bury their dead anew. Whom should they charge for the crime? Osama Bin Laden? With each drone strike, they bury their children anew. Whom should they charge for that crime? Or should they remain in awe of the benevolence of the imperial storm troopers after Iraq and Afghanistan that they used only precision high-tech strikes to kill far fewer innocent men women and children in Pakistan than they otherwise might have with “shock and awe” if General Collin Powel was still around? And feel gratified when it's only their own military (or jihadis) doing it to them – for surely, being dispatched to heaven by fellow Muslims is superior in some way than by infidels alone? What ought the Pakistanis to feel, think, and do? Or simply do nothing and let god sort it all out with the Hectoring Hegemons?

Who is the real enemy responsible for waging World War IV? Is it the mosque, the mullah, the military, the militants, the politicians who turn on a dime, Israel, India, ISI, NATO, America, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, or god who has fated this dastardly destiny so that it can nicely bring about its promised messiah and show the good and wronged people how really mighty powerful and merciful it is so that they may all bow even lower in praise showing up their rear end even higher; who?

Whosoever is the enemy, staying silent 'looking from the side' only invokes the curse of all victims throughout posterity :

“I still curse the killers, their accomplices, the indifferent spectators who knew and kept silent, and Creation itself, Creation and those who perverted and distorted it. I feel like screaming, howling like a madman so that that world, the world of the murderers, might know it will never be forgiven.”

I absolve myself, and my progeny from that curse. We have tried our best to be heard.

-###-

By Zahir Ebrahim A Project Humanbeingsfirst Document "The Pakistan Decapitation Papers" http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com:80/2009/10/foreword-pakistan-decapitation-papers.html | Humanbeingsfirst.org