« Hail to the Thief: The New York Times Defends Mikhail KhodorkovskyThe LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK »

Will 2011 see the creation of Palestine?

January 3rd, 2011

Khaled Amayreh


A Palestinian rioter, left, throws a stone at Israeli border police during
clashes in the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan

With the peace process going
nowhere, and the US having failed in its role as broker, Palestinian leaders are considering their options.

Palestinian Authority (PA) officials in Ramallah are reluctant to give an unequivocal answer to the question of whether 2011 will see the establishment of the state of Palestine. International goodwill is certainly what many Palestinians are pinning their hopes on. However, international goodwill alone won't be enough, especially if Israel resorts to stonewalling and if its guardian-ally, the United States, refuses to rein in Israeli intransigence and unilateralism.

Unfortunately, Palestinian experience with the way the US deals with Israel leaves little room for optimism that Washington will adopt a responsible stance and meaningfully support the establishment of Palestine. The powerful and extremist US Jewish lobby simply will not allow the current administration -- or any administration -- to take measures not in line with Israeli wishes. Meanwhile, the Palestinian leadership in Ramallah doesn't want to trivialise the issue by making another theatrical declaration of statehood similar to the one former Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat made in Algiers in 1988.

That declaration generated a lot of hullabaloo and prompted dozens of "friendly" countries, including Islamic and non-aligned countries, to recognise Palestine. But nothing really changed on the ground as the Israeli occupation deepened further and the theft of Palestinian land continued unabated.

Sources in Ramallah intimated to Al-Ahram Weekly that the PA leadership has decided to stay on "the safe side for the time being" pending potentially positive factors that could help consolidate international support for a would-be Palestinian state. The same sources added that the PA is also trying to ensure that the United States does not nip any Palestinian state in the bud by vetoing a draft resolution the PA is contemplating asking the UN Security Council to adopt in the foreseeable future.

Some PA officials have been cautioning against viewing the American role as "deterministic and indispensable". These argue that if the Obama administration or any other US administration is hopelessly subservient to the Jewish lobby, then nothing will work. This implies that the Palestinians would have to act without seeking America's approval.

According to sources close to PA President Mahmoud Abbas, the PA believes that making cumulative gains, even if small, including diplomatic achievements, is more expedient in the long run than making highly rhetorical declarations whose ultimate benefit can't be assured.

The Weekly asked Ghassan Khatib, director of the Government Press Office in Ramallah, why the PA was reluctant to declare statehood within 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. He said the PA would wait until summer, by which time it would formally ask the UN Security Council to recognise the state of Palestine within 1967 borders.

"Of course, we prefer consensual arrangements, but if Israel keeps obstructing peace, then we will have no choice but to seek international recognition," Khatib said.

Asked how the PA would react if the US conditioned recognition of a would-be Palestinian state on the PA giving Israel far reaching concessions unacceptable to most Palestinians, Khatib said: "The Palestinians are in no position to give any more concessions to Israel. We have already given excessive concessions when we agreed to share our historical homeland and to recognise Israel. We now stand with our backs to the wall, any further concessions by us to Israel, especially with regards to the fundamental issues, will be unacceptable to both our people and our leadership."

Israel's relentless expansion of settlements is the most direct challenge, but the occupation also has other means by which to block the emergence of a state of Palestine: the re-imposition of stiff travel restrictions on Palestinians; withholding Palestinian customs revenue; barring PA security personnel from accessing certain areas; and stopping exporting fuel to Palestinians. In short, Israel could resort to imposing on the West Bank the same punitive sanctions now imposed on the Gaza Strip.

This week, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman alluded to such punishments in order to force the Palestinians to refrain from taking the "present harmful course they are taking". "We have carrots as well as sticks, and we might use the latter effectively if we had to," said Lieberman, who also branded the PA an "illegitimate entity".

Lieberman may not fully represent the policies of the Israeli government. Earlier this week, Binyamin Benaliezer, veteran Labour politician and trade and labour minister, urged the Israeli government during a cabinet meeting to expedite the peace process, saying, "if we continue to drag our feet, even the United States will recognise Palestine. We must do everything possible to get the dialogue with the Palestinians even if it costs us a settlement freeze for a few months."

Benaliezer added: "I wouldn't be surprised if within a year the whole world supports a Palestinian state, including the United States. Then we would ask ourselves, where we were and what we were doing?"

But Lieberman, a senior coalition partner whose departure from the government could bring about its collapse, is not a classical Israeli politician. He would rather cause the current government coalition to implode than see it adopt policies that would lead to the creation of a genuine Palestinian state.

This week, Lieberman lashed out at Netanyahu when the latter described remarks by the foreign minister about Turkey and the PA as "representing Lieberman, not the government". Lieberman retorted: "I am not a spokesman for Netanyahu, I am entitled to my own opinion."

Lieberman is confident that in any new elections his party would win more seats in the Israeli Knesset than ever. Experts say his calculations may not be exaggerated.

-###-

From Khalid Amayreh in occupied East Jerusalem

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Chris Spencer Image from: France 24 Is Deep Seek American's Chinese Savior, or Just A Different 51 Flavor(s) of Censorship? DeepSeek: Unlocking the Internet Beyond Censorship In today's digital landscape, mainstream search engines like Google and Bing…
  • Cathy Smith The Myth of African Poverty Concocted by the Oligarchy The relations of the global powers to the continent, especially America, Russia, China, and Israel, have mainly been based on resource extraction, strategic economic influence, and…
  • Feminism was once a revolutionary force, a creed born out of struggle, resilience, and the dream of a world much different from what we had been given. It was born from the pain of millions of women working, poor, Black, Indigenous, women of color who refused to take the world as it was. And yet, today, feminism is an idea manipulated, diluted, commodified, and often controlled by those very forces that it initially came into being to dismantle from the military-industrial complex to corporate media giants; feminism today hardly resembles its initial mission of radical social transformation. This has happened because things are ingrained in how our media landscape rolls along. We hardly notice how forces remake feminist discourse into more palatable, consumer-friendly, and politically neutral forms. The corporations that run the media, the intelligence agencies that shape public opinion, and the political powers that remain in control have combined a grand symphony of influence that has redefined feminism, replacing its radical edges with a glittering but hollow vision of empowerment. It is time to reclaim the radical roots of feminism to inspire a new generation of activists to fight for real change.
  • Paul Craig Roberts President Trump’s economic proposals, with one exception, constitute a coherent package. I will address his proposals in a later column. Today I address his bad idea that would cause the failure of Trump’s renewal of the American…
  • Cindy Harper DeepSeek offers open-source generative AI with localized data storage but raises concerns over censorship, privacy, and disruption of Western markets. A recent regulatory clampdown in the United States on TikTok, a Chinese-owned social…
  • Fred Gransville 1) Water Monopolies: Who, When, Where, Why, and How? Water monopolies, a burgeoning threat of the 21st century, are rapidly gaining control over a resource that was once considered a public good. The scale of commercialization has surged…
  • Tracy Turner In a better world, the Arctic would be left to wolves, polar bears, seals, and whales. But not in this world, with our Robber Baron Politicians and Criminal CEOs. The Arctic, once a remote, frozen frontier, is now a hotbed of fierce…
  • Tracy Turner Abstract: The building blocks of 21st century American life, from suburban homes and lawns to gas-guzzling SUVs that clog roadways, have been rooted in excess. Today's culture of consumption controls almost every phase of our lives; excess…
  • Chris Spencer The State of Israel is an intricately interlinked part of the geopolitics of the region, largely through its special relationship with the United States, complemented by that with Russia, and now spreading toward Africa, Latin America, and…
  • By Cathy Smith God, my blade-server, encrypts my soul in the fortress of His protection, shielding me from the firewalls of fear. His commands are my protocols, sharpening my spirit like a flawless algorithm in the face of battle. Though the route of my…
January 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

  XML Feeds

Content Mangement System
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi