« US-Supported Islamic State Terrorists Seize PalmyraHats off to Norbert Lammert »

China's Military Strategy

May 27th, 2015

by Stephen Lendman

On May 26, China's official press agency Xinhua headlined "China rolls out military roadmap of 'active defense' strategy," saying:

An official white paper issued by the State Council Information Office titled "China's Military Strategy" pledged "closer international security cooperation."

It stressed "the principles of defense, self-defense and post-emptive strike." It said China isn't aggressive. It will "counterattack" if attacked. Focus will be placed on "winning informationized local wars." International security cooperation will be stressed "in areas crucially related to overseas interests."

Four "critical security domains" were highlighted - "ocean, outer space, cyberspace and nuclear force."

China's navy will defend offshore and "open seas" waters. Cybersecurity will be prioritized.

Beijing opposes weaponizing space. It "vowed to secure its space assets." It pledged no nuclear arms race with other countries.

It stressed a commitment to world peace and stability. It won't "pursue military expansion."

It fundamentally opposes hegemonism and power politics in all forms. It faces multiple complex security threats - including "illegal, military presence on China's territory, and outside parties involving themselves in South China Sea affairs," a clear reference to US regional meddling.

Beijing considers US South China Sea surveillance flights unacceptable provocations. The Pentagon admits flying its most advanced P-8A-Poseidon spy plane regularly in the area - monitoring Beijing activities primarily.

A May 25 state-run Global Times editorial bluntly warned:

"If the United States' bottom line is that China has to halt its activities, then a US-China war is inevitable in the South China Sea."

"China will have no choice but to engage" in response to US provocations. Beijing's waters are its own. Its message says it won't tolerate US intervention where it doesn't belong.

China is concerned about America's increasing Asia/Pacific presence as well as Japan's intent on "overhauling its military and security policies" cooperatively with Washington.

"(A)nti-China forces have never given up their attempt to instigate a color revolution" against Beijing, the white paper said. The risk of potential conflict is real.

Hawkish US senators want a comprehensive anti-China strategy adopted. In a letter to Defense Secretary Carter, they said "longstanding interests of the United States, as well as our allies and partners, stand at considerable risk."

They want Beijing challenged in its own part of the world - perhaps belligerently. On the one hand, they slam China's legitimate military presence in its own territory.

On the other, they ignore menacing US bases, nuclear-armed navy and tens of thousands of US combat troops close to China's borders - a direct threat to its security.

Last week, US Pacific Command (PACOM) hosted military officials from 22 Asia/Pacific countries in Hawaii. China notably was excluded.

A symposium discussed amphibious military strategies, tactics and capabilities. A US marines amphibious assault demonstration was featured.

Washington aims to integrate amphibious operations with Pacific area nations and ally them against China's growing regional strength and influence.

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said Washington may expand military patrols in Pacific rim waters - including around China's Spratly Archipelago land reclamation project involving construction of artificial islands atop coral reefs.

US Pacific fleet commander Admiral Harry Harris accused Beijing of building a "great wall of sand" in disputed waters.

He claimed "the scope and pace of building man-made islands raises serious questions about Chinese intentions."

The area involved is 1.5 square miles. "How China proceeds will be a key indicator of whether the region is heading towards confrontation or cooperation." Harris said.

America's belligerent presence risks the former. Apparently nothing was learned from lost Korean and Southeast Asian wars.

China justifiably claims the right to build in its own territorial waters - "indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha (Spratly) Islands and adjacent waters," it says.

Washington has no right to meddle in a part of the world not its own. China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said America should avoid "risky and provocative approaches to maintain regional peace and stability."

She stressed China will defend its territorial sovereignty. Unauthorized intrusions will be challenged.

Longstanding US overreach may lead to direct confrontation with China. The risk of potential conflict is real.

-###-

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks World War III".

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programsNetwork.

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Paul Craig Roberts Jobs Offshoring and Work Visas Are Means of Enriching Corporate Executives with “Performance bonuses” for Replacing American Labor with Lower Paid Foreign Labor, thus Reducing Aggregate Demand in the US From The Failure of Laissez…
  • By David Swanson Wouldn’t it be nice if the war in Ukraine were entirely one side’s fault, if the U.S. had one political party that did everything perfectly, if USAID had only ever caused either benefit or harm, and if all the self-contradictory…
  • Janet Campbell Image: Freepik When you care deeply about a cause, it’s natural to want to make an impact. But taking meaningful action in your community isn’t just about passion—it’s about strategy, persistence, and connection. Whether you’re advocating…
  • Paul Craig Roberts and Larry Sparano Discuss the Fight Ahead This is my interview by Larry Sparano of a few days ago prior to my learning, as I posted yesterday, that the temporary injunctions that judges are issuing against Trump and Musk’s activities…
  • Andrew Korybko Andrew Korybko's Newsletter The US could move its nascent “New Détente” with Russia further along by either forcing the G7 and UNGA Resolution sponsors to change their language about “Russian aggression” or refusing to attach its name to…
  • Paul Craig Roberts If there is gold in Ft. Knox, whose is it? Many bullion dealers believe that any gold in Ft. Knox is not ours. Over the decades the gold was “leased” to bullion dealers who sold it into the gold market, thereby protecting the value of…
  • Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic “Dresden was known as a city that was overcrowded by up to 500,000 German refugees from the east.” The Three Men of Slashing        It was in May/September 1945 when WWII ended – the bloodiest and most horrible war ever fought…
  • Robert David The so-called ‘free market’ was never free—it’s a stage-managed spectacle where financial elites dictate the rules, rig the system, and ensure that true competition never sees the light of day. What if the so-called 'free market' was never…
  • Chris Spencer Discover the powerful herbs and vitamins that support neurogenesis and neuroprotection, promoting brain health and resilience against cognitive decline. Key players like Bacopa Monnieri, Ashwagandha, Omega-3s, and Vitamin D provide…
  • Tracy Turner Discover how pro-Zionist media outlets shape narratives around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This article explores tactics such as framing and selective omission, which often portray Israel as a victim while overlooking Palestinian…
February 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  

  XML Feeds

Responsive CMS
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi