« Senate Caves on Fast TrackWhy are some Lebanese Sunni Muslims becoming sympathetic toward Da’ish (ISIS)? »

Irresponsible Iran Bashing

June 27th, 2015

by Stephen Lendman

The world's number one human rights abuser on a global scale annually publishes individual country reports excluding itself. One-sided bias describes how Washington views independent governments it wants replaced by ones it controls - vilifying them irresponsibly.

Its latest 2014 Iran human rights report contains a litany of exaggerations, misinformation and Big Lies.

Included are false claims of speech, press, religion and assembly restrictions, disappearances, arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, murder, denial of free elections, due process and judicial fairness, anti-Semitism among other misreported allegations listed.

It's not surprising. US hostility toward Iran is longstanding. Nothing in prospect suggests change. A June 30 P5+1 nuclear talks deadline approaches.

Iran wants its legitimate rights respected. It wants to be treated no differently from dozens of other countries with peaceful nuclear programs.

It justifiably resents being unjustly accused of possibly wanting nuclear weapons when no evidence suggests it. Plenty shows its program has no military component or a desire to have one.

At the same time, America's nuclear arsenal and Israel's threaten world peace. Real dangers are ignored - fabricated ones hyped.

US media scoundrels regurgitate the usual Big Lies about Iran - instead of explaining things accurately.

New York Times editors notoriously bash Iran irresponsibly. Their latest broadside headlined "Ayatollah Khamenei's Fateful Choice, saying:

Iranians "are jeopardizing the nuclear agreement that would benefit them and the security of the region."

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "stiffen(ed) his hard line against concessions…(won't) abide any long-term freeze on Iran's 'sensitive nuclear work'…ruled out foreign inspections of Iranian military sites…insist(s) all economic sanctions be lifted immediately…and" won't allow IAEA inspections.

Fact: Washington bears full responsibility for "jeopardizing" a nuclear agreement and undermining regional security.

Fact: Khamenei wants Iran's legitimate nuclear rights respected. His latest comments are no different from earlier ones.

Fact: Tehran's so-called "sensitive work" is legal, NPT-permitted nuclear research.

Fact: No nation allows inspections of its military facilities and others related to national security.

Fact: Iran cooperates fully with IAEA inspectors. At the same time, Khomenei justifiably criticized the agency as being politicized - "not (being) an independent and fair body…"

He said "Iranian authorities, while insisting on (the nation's) red lines, are pursuing a good deal, which is fair and honorable in line with Iran's interests."

America wants its nuclear program marginalized and weakened in its current legitimate form, he explained.

It wants pressure and "cruel sanctions" maintained. Khomenei insists they all be lifted immediately when a deal is consummated. They never should have been imposed in the first place. They're illegitimate under international law.

"The lifting of sanctions must not be contingent on the implementation of Iran’s undertakings," Khomenei said.

"They should not say (Iran) should fulfill (its) commitments and the (IAEA) should then verify it in order for the sanctions to be lifted. We do not accept this issue at all."

Times editors lied claiming his comments diverged from April's framework agreement. Nothing he said indicates disagreement or change from what he said many times before.

Washington keeps reinterpreting Lausanne, lifting the bar irresponsibly, then blaming Iran for refusing to accept changes to agreed on terms.

Times editors ludicrously suggested Khomenei possibly "has no intention of accepting any nuclear agreement with the West."

He'll have to "live with the economic and political consequences if he sabotages this deal," they said.

For decades, Iran sought normalized relations with Washington and other Western nations. It seeks mutual cooperation with all nations.

It wants conflict with none. It wants its legitimate rights respected. It wants isolating efforts by the West ended.

It's up against the power and influence of Israel, its lobby and America's corrupt Congress wanting final say on any nuclear deal - suggesting opposition to whatever Israel won't accept, a sure deal-killer irresponsibly blamed on Iran if differences aren't resolved.

-###-

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks World War III".

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs

Tags: iran

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Chris Spencer Draining the Swamp? Is that even possible? An Analysis of Dwight Eisenhower's and Joe Biden's Ominous Warnings, Assassinations of JFK, MLK, and RFK Eisenhower's farewell address was less a goodbye and more a dire warning wrapped in a…
  • Fred Gransville The More It Changes, the More It Stays the Same. "Rebellion" of Status Quo. Social Justice via Corporate Hegemony, Neoliberalism, Global Elites, Political Rhetoric, Think Tanks, Corporate State, Faux Democracy, Anti-Human Rights, Empire…
  • Janet Campbell Image via Freepic Starting a business in your community offers the unique opportunity to create something meaningful while building connections with those around you. It begins with understanding the needs of your area and aligning your…
  • Tracy Turner Modern Feminism Chants Equality Ad infinitum While Promoting Misandry A Cultural Revolution at the Hands of Covert Influence The very fabric of modern civilization is inculcated with the contributions of legions of people, mostly men, whose…
  • by Tracy Turner January 17 Update: Eaton/Palisades Fires $390+ Billion in Damage Do their red ties blind these politicians (Listed below), or are they not just enemies of California? Are they purveyors of a globalist agenda, a term used to describe a…
  • Paul Craig Roberts Dear Friends, I am as tired of challenging and distressing news as you. Today there is a treat instead. The treat is “the Tall Texan,” the American pianist Van Cliburn playing Tchaikovsky’s First Piano Concerto at the first Soviet…
  • by Ellen Brown North Dakota is staunchly conservative, having voted Republican in every presidential election since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. So how is it that the state boasts the only state-owned bank in the nation? Has it secretly gone socialist? No.…
  • Dr. Althea Mentes An Exposé of The Brain Police Mental health care has always been in conflict and dispute, struggling with deep-seated cultural perceptions, changing medical practices, and a growing tide of mighty industry profit. What is often…
  • By David Swanson Like the Republican Party whose senators will make Pete Hegseth the next U.S. Secretary of War, Hegseth is a bad joke. The Democratic minority in the horribly unrepresentative Senate is a joke you might hear at an amateur mic night.…
  • The real question in the 21st century is not "Are we living in a simulation?" but "Are we living in a prison?" Welcome to the Digital Matrix-a highly interconnected web of surveillance, AI, predictive analytics, and corporate greed that seeks to trap…
January 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

  XML Feeds

Advanced CMS
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi