« Psychologists Aiding CIA TortureEntrapping Greece in Debt »

US Bullying Iran to Capitulate in Nuclear Talks

July 14th, 2015

by Stephen Lendman

Iran nuclear talks continue without resolution - whether possible looks tenuous at best. US bullying bears full responsibility.

America doesn't negotiate. It demands - at the same time blaming others for its do what we say or else position.

"(W)e are not going to sit at the negotiating table forever," John Kerry blustered on Thursday. "If tough decisions don't get made, we are absolutely prepared to call an end to this process" - code language saying resolution depends on Iran's capitulation to outrageous, unacceptable US demands. On Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif accused Western P5+1 countries (mainly America) of "shift(ing) positions and (making) excessive demands."

They've "made the negotiations difficult," he said. "We want a dignified agreement and negotiations, and we will continue to negotiate. The deal would be within reach should the other side seek an honorable and balanced accord."

"There are always new ideas on any negotiating table. It is important for everybody to stick to what we have already agreed, and to move forward based on that."

An unnamed Iranian official close to talks said Washington and other Western nations keep moving the bar - changing what was previously agreed on.

"We see certain changes in the positions particularly just last night…on a lot of issues unfortunately," the source said. "There was an approach that was acceptable…but then all of a sudden people came up with some view for changing ideas, and this makes it rather difficult."

At this stage, talks could "go either way," the source added. Success or failure hangs in the balance. A deal is within reach if US-led Western nations "abandon unnecessary or delusional objectives and just move forward with what is at hand (and) achievable." Instead, they're pushing things into "deadlock."

Another unnamed negotiator said Iran offered "constructive proposals" to resolve remaining differences - so far not accepted.

Tehran won't be coerced into a deal harming its interests - nor should it. Washington is playing hardball to pressure it to agree to unreasonable demands no responsible government would accept.

Meanwhile, in July 7 testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, top Pentagon officials voiced opposition to lifting the arms embargo on Iran as part of sanctions relief.

Joint Chiefs chairman General Martin Dempsey said "under no circumstances should we relieve pressure on Iran relative to ballistic missile capabilities and arms trafficking."

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter wants Tehran kept "isolated" and prevented from improving its military capability. "Whatever happens as far as an agreement over the nuclear program with respect to Iran is concerned, I think we…have a clear duty in the Department of Defense, first of all, to defend our friends and allies…especially Israel," he said.

In mid-June, Iranian lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a motion to spare no efforts to safeguard the nation's nuclear rights and achievements. The measure passed 185 to two with four abstentions.

It called for lifting all sanctions immediately when or if a final deal is consummated. It approved conventional and regular IAEA inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities. It prohibits unrestricted access to its nuclear scientists, military sites, and sensitive non-nuclear facilities "under any pretext."

It affirms Iran's legitimate right to develop peaceful nuclear technology - including procurement, production and R & D. It refuses to sacrifice national sovereignty to unreasonable US-led Western demands.

As of now, talks are deadlocked. As long as Washington remains irresponsibly hardline, resolving things equitably won't happen.

Was that Obama's scheme all along - head-fake US good faith diplomacy followed by unacceptable hardline demands, blaming Iran for his duplicity when talks fail? We may know for sure within days.

-###-

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks World War III".

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • A prophetic and theological critique of global surveillance systems through the lens of the Bible, Koran, and Torah. This article examines AI technologies like Project Lavender, Palantir, and predictive policing, contrasting them with the compassionate omniscience of El Roi—the God Who Sees. By invoking scripture, prophecy, and Orwellian warnings, it exposes the ethical and spiritual dangers of modern techno-authoritarianism.
  • Ned Lud Book I: The Image of the Beast “He had eyes like a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns... And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them...” — Revelation 13:7, 19:12 "And he causeth all, both small and…
  • From Reddit bunkers to passport enclaves, millions of men are vanishing from marriage, dating, and civic life—not out of hatred, but exhaustion. In the age of HR authoritarianism and DEI dogma, the modern man isn’t toxic—he’s tired. This image captures…
  • Tracy Turner Fig. 1 As in 1914, tangled alliances (U.S.-NATO-Israel vs. Russia-China-Houthis), economic warfare (sanctions, Red Sea blockades), and rogue actors (Houthi missiles, AI decapitation strikes) hurtle humanity toward nuclear brinkmanship.…
  • Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic The unified German Empire, proclaimed in Versailles in January 1871, contemplated balancing the division of the world’s colonies, the markets, and the sources of the world’s raw material.¹ Exceptionally, the pan-Germanic…
  • By Chris Spencer Conspiracy Theory and Conspiracy Theorist are government monikers, designed to discredit, silence, obfuscate and change real government overreach and malfeasance into lunatic fringe. Victims of Directed Energy Weapons in the U.S. end up…
  • Copyright © 2025 National Endowment for Democracy Artificial Intelligence has become autocrats’ newest tool for surveilling, targeting, and crushing dissent. Activists must learn how to harness it in the fight for freedom. By Albert Cevallos     Online…
  • By David Swanson The Alien and Sedition Acts were laws created in 1798 to carve out exceptions to the 1791 Bill of Rights, by banning statements against the government, making it harder to become a citizen, allowing the imprisonment and deportation of…
  • A prophetic reckoning: As biblical Revelations unfold in real time, the American taxpayer bankrolls bloodletting in Gaza (2023–2025), while the nation scrolls in silence. Ned Lud Code, Consent, and Carnage. A Manifesto in the Shadow of Revelation…
  • By Mark Aurelius Trump calls Harvard ‘a joke’ while threatening funds https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5251335-trump-harvard-funding-joke/ ““Harvard is a JOKE, teaches Hate and Stupidity, and should not longer receive Federal Funds,” Trump wrote…
April 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

  XML Feeds

Multiple blogs solution
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi