Chris Spencer

The most disturbing phenomena within global political discourse are genocide technologies, manipulation of media, and Precrime strategies. These mind-control critical junctures between ethics, power, and technology affect the lives of billions of individuals and broader societal structures. Whereas surveillance has gone beyond governments into private enterprise, media manipulation has moved way beyond with big data and algorithmic AI precision.

Precrime- the notion of acting before violence or terrorism occurs - began in science fiction but has increasingly found its way into real world abusive, rights-denying security and policing strategies. Intelligence agencies at the center of such developments include Unit 8200 and Mossad of Israel, whose use of surveillance technologies has international ramifications. This essay examines the intersection of surveillance, media manipulation, and Precrime intelligence, focusing on Israel's operations in Gaza and its international relevance.

Predictive Policing and Ethical Dilemmas of Precrime

What started as a theoretical fictional concept, popularized in George Orwell's 1984 and later explored in Philip K. Dick's Minority Report, has grown in scope into the unpleasant reality of Precrime. Predictive policing uses predictive analytics and surveillance technologies to identify and prevent crimes before they occur by harassing would-be, might-be “criminals” with no due process. By analyzing historical crime data and real - time surveillance, algorithms predict where crimes might occur, who may commit them, and who could be victims. Systems like PredPol use machine learning models to forecast criminal events by analyzing past crime patterns (Perry et al., 2013).

While these technologies are touted as promising for improving public safety, they also raise serious concerns regarding civil liberties, particularly those related to privacy and racial profiling, Lum & Isaac, 2016. Predictive policing can target individuals for actions they have not yet committed but are machine-predicted to be committed, just like in Minority Report's Precrime system. This AI algorithmic snitching raises severe ethical and legal issues and contradicts basic principles of justice, such as due process, equality before the law, and the presumption of innocence. The presumption of impending guilt is a systemic bias in favor of the fascist police state. Future funding is based on AI algorithms that depend on imagining thought crime.

The question is not just whether predictive policing works, but whether it can be trusted to be fair and unbiased in how it's applied. Precrime is Law and Order untampered by justice, in Orwellian Newspeak, Law and Order without justice or mercy is straight out fascism.

Unit 8200 and the Israeli Model of Precrime Surveillance

Within the national security context, Israel's Unit 8200 is one of the most advanced Precrime intelligence gatherers. Specializing in cyberwarfare, signals intelligence, and data analysis, Unit 8200 is at the heart of Israel's counterterrorism operations inside Gaza and beyond. The unit uses the most advanced technologies for surveillance, including intercepting communications, facial recognition, hacking into surveillance cameras, tracking movements via satellite and mobile phones, and monitoring social media to identify potential threats. The core of Unit 8200's operations is pre-“attack” intelligence - the goal is to predict an attack before it happens. This error towards suspicion is the premise by which the Mossad is training U.S. Police Departments in “Counter-Terrorism,” wherein the general public are “the terrorists.”

This digital concept mirrors predictive policing but on an international scale: monitoring militant groups, such as Hamas in Gaza, and other regional enemies, as well as you and I. The Israeli version of “God’s Justice” is punishment before the crime, you are guilty of the thoughts that a machine “thinks” you will have. Animal Rights activists are among those listed as “terrorists,” as vegetarianism, too, is a form of terrorism.

Thus, metadata analysis and interception of communication enabled Unit 8200 to trace and identify individuals or groups before they had actually committed any attack (Zenz, 2020). Such methods are considered “efficient” although not just, not rights protective since the potential threats will be identified without waiting for a crime to be committed. Thus, meeting the Precrime model in real life, counter-terrorism activities justify the chilling effect on former rights. The enablers of this unjust version of “the law” do not see that they, themselves have become the terrorists they claim to be combating.

Gaza: Ethical and Legal Challenges of Precrime Intelligence

While Israel's preemptive intelligence operations, including those by Unit 8200, have thwarted several terrorist plots, they come with significant controversy, especially in Gaza. The extensive surveillance required to track potential threats often means monitoring civilians alongside suspected militants. Human rights organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have condemned Israel's use of surveillance technologies in Gaza, particularly when such methods target individuals based on predictive intelligence without concrete evidence of criminal intent. The implementation is justification for genocide, for war crimes.

In Gaza, Israel has employed drone surveillance, satellite imaging, and phone tapping to monitor suspected militants. Critics argue that Precrime intelligence can lead to the wrongful targeting of civilians or those flagged as threats due to incomplete or biased data. These operations often result in extrajudicial killings, detentions, or military strikes, raising serious concerns about due process and the ethics of preemptive security measures (Eubanks, 2018). In this context, the line between legitimate national security and the erosion of individual rights becomes dangerously blurred. More than 44,000 have died in the genocide, mostly women and children under age 14, all justified by “predictive analytics” – machines killing humans.

In this sense, such genocide is understood to be a method of political control, where Israel is able to monitor substantial sections of the population of Gaza with no link to terrorism. To critics, it is one more measure aimed at dampening political opposition and controlling movement, dissent and social lanes in Palestinian life.

The Global Reach of Precrime Surveillance: Mossad and International Influence

Exporting Anti-Terror Surveillance Technologies: Israel's Global Influence

The impact of Israel's intelligence apparatus extends, however, far beyond Gaza, particularly when it comes to surveillance and preemptive intelligence strategies. Many countries, particularly in the U.S., Middle East and North Africa, have modelled their intelligence gathering operations after Israel's successful counterterrorism “experience.” Saudi Arabia and the UAE have used Israeli-developed surveillance technologies - most notably those developed by Unit 8200 - to monitor citizens and political dissidents.

The Mossad serves as Israel's foreign intelligence service that, over the years, has also played a very important role in antiterrorism by “preventing” many acts of precrime around the globe. Through coordination with services such as the CIA and MI6, Mossad shared their intelligence to help those thwart thoughts before they take place. While this sort of collaboration can be fascist in application, it is also, inherently, controversial, resting solely on how the intelligence is applied, and with the public, to what degree. Claiming to stop crimes which never happened is an emperor’s invisible robe.

Among Mossad's better-known preemptive operations was the tracking and capturing of high - ranking Nazis during the 1960s and 1970s that had participated in the mass killings of Jews, Christians, and Gypsies, referred to as the Holocaust. Although such activities received massive appreciation at that time, in modern times their applicability in terms of terrorist organization matters does cause questions from security and human rights standpoints. These get exacerbated when greater reliance falls upon surveillance technology and predictive intelligence, particularly in countries whose authoritarian leaders would have no compunction misusing these techniques. The Mossad is no longer hunting Nazis, but they are hunting you and me.

Surveillance, Media Manipulation, and the Global Narrative

Increasingly, surveillance technologies play a larger role in relation to media manipulation, not least in constructing public perception of security and political incidents. For instance, Israel selectively leaked intelligence reports narratives to media outlets as justification for military attacks and operations. In doing so, through selective use of information, intelligence serves to present a narrative of necessity: framing individuals or groups as security threats legitimizes targeted actions.

In an international perspective, Precrime intelligence implementation often comes with media campaigns that legitimize the use of fascist practices. Israel, for example, framed its wide-range genocide operations in Gaza as being essential for national security and the protection of its citizens. This kind of selective narrative, (fictional story) is used in the formation of public opinion both nationally and internationally, giving a reason behind preemptive genocidal actions (precrime assassinations) and violation of International Law.

On a global scale, media manipulation is employed to justify genocide, foster nationalism, suppress dissent, and control geopolitical narratives. In the case of Israel, intelligence is used as both a military and media tool, influencing both military strategies and public perceptions. With the rise of genocide capitalism, personal data is increasingly commodified, with governments and corporations leveraging it to manipulate public opinion and influence public perception (perceiving genocide as preemptive antiterror).

The intersection of Precrime intelligence, surveillance, and media manipulation is a complex and extremely contentious aspect of modern “security” practices. The activities of Unit 8200 in Gaza, put in the context of Israel's broader use of genocidal technologies, highlight both the potential and the dangers of taking a preemptive approach to “security threats”. While such methods can be highly effective in thwarting terrorist activities, they raise serious ethical and legal concerns about life, liberty, due process, and genocide.

As genocidal technologies continue to evolve, their global impact will reach beyond national security policies into how political power is exercised. The exportation of Israeli surveillance strategies, increasing dependence on predictive intelligence, and the use of media manipulation are all harbingers of a future in which surveillance and Precrime intelligence are not only tools of national security but also instruments of political control. These technologies, therefore, need ethical and legal consideration with regard to human rights and broader implementation of their use locally and internationally. What happens in Gaza, now, will also happen elsewhere, with gullible humans going nose blind to the stench of death. The governments of Israel and the U.S. find it acceptable for the Media to use the terns Surveillance State and Nanny State interchangeably, as camouflage. Both governments are Death Cults.

The disturbing trend towards a fascist police state under the guise of democratic freedom-which both Israel and the United States are “leading” - is a profound shift in global governance. The intersection of surveillance, genocide, media manipulation, and Precrime intelligence systems, largely cultivated through Israeli agencies like Unit 8200 and Mossad, is an alarming blueprint for control rather than security. The model of predictive policing, at first a theoretical concept, is now being used not only to predict potential crimes but also to preemptively eliminate what is deemed as potential threats (to execute “potential” criminals) without evidence, without trial, and often without justification.

To the political elites and powerful institutions pushing this agenda, it's not just about security; it's about control. Surveillance systems monitoring every digital movement and predictive analytics projecting every possible infraction create a world where dissent is criminalized before it actually occurs. Media manipulation nurtures a climate of fear and misinformation, allowing those in power to frame their actions-often violent and extrajudicial-as necessary for national security. It is this chilling confluence of surveillance, data collection, and media orchestration that stifles freedom and gives an authoritarian regime license to widen its grip on power. The system of international connectivity expands the frontiers so that this model cannot be confined either to Israel or the U.S.; it is being exported, from the Middle East to Western democracies, shaping a world in which privacy is a privilege, not a right.

In this emerging reality, Precrime has emerged from the pages of science fiction to take on a very active, broad-based policy of a world where individuals are guilty of crimes they have not yet committed; where guilt is determined by an algorithm; and where suppression of dissent is marketed as national security. So, why is this happening? The simple, grim answer is that those who wield power fear the consequences of a truly free and informed populace. They understand that a society resisting surveillance, questioning narratives, and challenging authority is a society that threatens their interests. It's easier to control the future by removing the unpredictability of dissent through preemptive strikes-whether that be in the form of mass surveillance, political repression, or media control.

Yet even as these forces grow stronger, and their methods more insidious, the fight against such tyranny is far from over.

Every step on the road to a global police state must be resisted. Dissent may now be criminalized, but that's all the more reason to resist. In a world where those in power seek to make dissent illegal, it is incumbent upon all of us—no matter the risks—to refuse compliance, to push back, and to defend the fundamental rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and the right to challenge injustice. The stakes could not be higher, and in the face of such pervasive control, silence becomes complicity. Resist, even if it is criminalized. For in the end, if we do not stand against it, we will have forfeited the very essence of our humanity.

References

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High - Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.

King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 485–501.

Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To Predict and Serve? Significance, 13(5), 14 - 19.

O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.

Perry, W. L., McInnis, B., Price, C. C., Smith, A., & Hollywood, J. S. (2013). Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. RAND Corporation.

Zenz, A. (2020). The Uyghur Genocide: An Examination of China’s Policies in Xinjiang. Journal of Genocide Research, 22(4), 418 - 439.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

-###-

Precrime, Genocide, and Media Manipulation: Global and Local Implications; Unit 8200 and Mossad
https://olivebiodiesel.com/Israel_U.S._Death_Cults.html