Fraud, Betrayal, Immorality

Tracy Turner

COINTELPRO, a program conceived in the 1950s under J. Edgar Hoover, still stands as one of the darkest chapters in US intelligence history. Its unprecedented systematic attempt at political activism mind control and the aftermath it left in civil rights and liberties make it a significant part of US history. The program, headed by Hoover, had the stated aim of neutralizing and surveilling groups deemed subversive or a threat to the status quo. These included civil rights organizations, left-wing political activists, Black Power movements, and anti-Vietnam War protestors. However, COINTELPRO was just one element in a broader network of government-sanctioned surveillance, repression, and psychological manipulation aimed at suppressing political dissent. This article will be about the roots of Cointelpro through to now-we live under "Smart" Cointelpro, aka as Tyranny. Operation Paperclip was a U.S. program to recruit Nazi scientists for military and intelligence purposes starting in 1945. It included prominent figures such as Dr. Josef Mengele, who conducted horrific human experimentation in Auschwitz, and Hubertus Strughold, later to become a leading figure in U.S. space medicine. The second character is Otto Bode, another researcher in mind control. A number of the scientists involved with these psychological war operations were associated with the mind control experiment, with techniques such as MKUltra from the CIA. A drug and hypnosis-based study for behavioral control, among others, was devised in which many of these people running the infamous and unethical programs had previously performed the same types of experiments in prison camps during the war. The U.S. overlooked their Nazi ties in exchange for their expertise.

Covert operations, which are now supposedly involving the FBI in concert with agencies such as the CIA, NSA, and the general Military Intelligence Technology Complex, have taken a turn and progressed to things as highly sophisticated as their Drone and Satellite Vircators. Theoretically included is an array of microwave or directed energy weapons, or DEWs, part of a general class of new high-tech tools for combat or control.

The Active Denial System is a millimeter-wave technology microwave weapon system designed to cause nonlethal effects, including intense heat capable of dispersing crowds or incapacitating targets without permanent injury. Other systems use high-powered microwave and radiofrequency energy to disrupt electronics, cause thermal effects, and act as anti-personnel devices. These would include not only crowd control but also EMPs that could take out infrastructure and advanced energy beam weapons—what some people colloquially refer to as "ray guns." The applications range from area denial to soft-kill operations, using pulsed electromagnetic energy to disable or deter without physical destruction.

Long-range acoustic devices and systems that weaponize RF energy or electromagnetic radiation—the list of such technologies goes on and on, and this is how non-lethal deterrents are now becoming a very important part of modern security and defense strategies. Examples include Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman for leading the development and manufacturing of such weapons, and other firms being BAE Systems, Rheinmetall, Leonardo, and Thales. Where foreign elements are the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, Russia's Rostec, and India's Defence Research and Development Organisation. Other famous government agencies involved in their development include DARPA, the US Air Force Research Laboratory, and the Directed Energy Directorate. Academic and industrial research bodies such as the China Academy of Engineering Physics and Elbit Systems point to the interest and investment in microwave and directed energy weapons worldwide.

This tends to be in relation to newer technologies and their implications for defense and ethical matters.

Smart Cointelpro represents a multi-dimensional threat to political control. It is within this context that the most infamous mechanism of COINTELPRO—that which utilized surveillance—operated, from wiretapping and mail interception to undercover agents infiltrating political groups. The line between legitimate law enforcement and political repression was blurred in the actions of the FBI. Whereas COINTELPRO was designed to counter what the FBI termed "radical threats," these operations frequently targeted nonviolent activists or civil rights leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Fred Hampton. The FBI cloaked its activities in a domestic security narrative, in which the Cold War was a context in which dissenters were constructed as security threats.

But the FBI did not act in a vacuum. The CIA, NSA, and military intelligence were running their secret operations, many of which had similar purposes. This effort to monitor and control political activism during the 1960s and 1970s was not limited to COINTELPRO but involved a series of covert programs designed to destroy social justice movements. These included Operation CHAOS, MKUltra, Project Paperclip, and others.

The FBI's war against civil rights movements was particularly odious in its targeting of the leadership and membership of the Civil Rights Movement after the victory of nonviolent resistance mobilized by figures such as Martin Luther King, Jr. The agency aimed to undermine the SCLC and other organizations through a mix of surveillance, disinformation, and psychological warfare. At the peak of FBI influence, such attempts of discredit by the FBI reached their apogee, culminating in the infamous 'anonymous letter sent to King in 1964, encouraging him to commit suicide after attacking King's character and personal life' (Garrow, 1986). This ruthless campaign had a profound impact on the civil rights movement, and understanding this impact is crucial to empathizing with the struggle of these activists.

However, the efforts of COINTELPRO did not stop with Martin Luther King Jr. These efforts also included the targeting of the Black Panther Party—a group that supported Black Power and armed self-defense against police brutality—through infiltration, rumor-spreading, and incitement to intergroup violence. Despite the extreme measures taken by the bureau, the courage and determination of the activists, such as Fred Hampton, the head of the Black Panther Party in Illinois, who was killed in 1969 by the FBI in a raid that killed him while he slept, are truly admirable. Their unwavering bravery in the face of such adversity is a source of inspiration and commands respect and admiration.

COINTELPRO and African American Activists

The FBI's infiltration and disinformation operations were targeted explicitly against Black Power. COINTELPRO was designed to discredit the Black Panther Party and Nation of Islam using informants inside these groups who created splits in the organization and then passed on fabricated news to the press. These tactics were not limited to the Black Panther Party; other African American civil rights leaders, such as Malcolm X, experienced them. FBI harassment against Malcolm X involved surveillance, manipulation of public opinion, and attempts to incite violence on his part against other leaders. They also worked to monitor Black Power Movement activists, often penetrating local chapters of such groups as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), seeking to disrupt activities and shape public perceptions of African American radicals.

FBI Targeting of the Black Panther Party

The FBI's direct targeting of the Black Panther Party is perhaps the clearest example of its counterintelligence efforts to destroy a political movement through covert operations. The Black Panther Party represented a unique threat to the FBI due to its influence in urban centers and its advocacy for armed self-defense. It was through COINTELPRO that the FBI employed disinformation, infiltration by informants, and deadly force in the assassination of Fred Hampton. Other tactics the FBI used included psychological warfare: spreading rumors to sow distrust within the Party and provoke violent confrontations.

Furthermore, it demonstrates that the FBI's focus on the Black Panther Party was part of the broader scheme against the movement in general and against the plethora of smaller, grass-roots groups and activist community-based organizations whose interests were with those of the Black Panther Party. Despite the FBI's attempts to sow discord, the unity and solidarity among the various civil rights groups and activist organizations are a testament to the strength of the movements and the sense of community they fostered. Quite clearly, it was all an attempt to destroy such entities' moral character and their leaders as violent criminals.

COINTELPRO Penetrating Technique

One of the most used tactics under COINTELPRO was infiltration. The FBI placed informants within the activist groups to break down the internal cohesion. The informants would incite violence or provoke leaders into radical actions that could then be used to justify legal intervention. Paid FBI informers operating within the Black Panther Party set about creating trumped-up charges and theft of intimate materials or introduction of its members into criminal hands. This seemed to succeed for the FBI on the one hand by debilitating the Panthers but also threw internal division within such civil rights struggles.

FBI Suppression of Political Dissent

These tactics of surveillance and infiltration were not limited to the Black Panther Party or the Civil Rights Movement. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, the FBI worked to suppress political dissent from a broad range of movements. Anti-Vietnam War groups comprised yet another threat to national security and, as such, were subjected to surveillance and intelligence gathering under programs such as COINTELPRO and Operation CHAOS. The latter was the CIA's creation and referred to the infiltration of anti-war groups and protest movements, also using methods like monitoring and disinformation campaigns from COINTELPRO.

Another category of such targets consisted of Students for a Democratic Society, Weathermen, and other extreme left-wing parties. The FBI resorted to an unprecedented level of manipulation of the psyches and the spreading of misleading information in an attempt to depict the political activists as dangerous radicals—thus justifying intervention by the government (Garcia, 2019).

Phil Ochs, The Mamas and the Papas, Jerry Garcia, and Counterculture Icons

However, aside from the civil rights and Black Power movements, COINTELPRO also targeted many countercultural icons that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s. These figures were symbolic to the FBI of the more extraordinary revolt against government authority within society, cultural, and political life.

The famous folk singer Phil Ochs was a victim due to his music, which carried many politically incorrect messages against the US policy, particularly about the Vietnam War. Ochs's anti-establishment songs like I Ain't Marching Anymore made him a recognizable voice in America and a target for the US government. As a result, FBI surveillance and COINTELPRO-like methods sought to sabotage his career by portraying him as a threat. Another would be the Grateful Dead band leader Jerry Garcia, seen as possibly radical and indeed a dangerous influence for long periods due to his music culture.

These figures represented, at times in poignant and unique form, the wide ideological rebellion and political dissent that took place during the 1960s, and thus became fair targets of FBI suppression, illustrating how COINTELPRO had a far-reaching impact on the public and artistic communities.

The Rise of Smart COINTELPRO (1976-2023)

In the decades following the end of COINTELPRO, one might think that the suppression of dissent would come to an end. But the legacy of COINTELPRO didn't die with its official termination in the 1970s. As surveillance technologies advanced, so did the scope and sophistication of intelligence operations, leading to the rise of Smart COINTELPRO.

This new wave of COINTELPRO, stretching from the 1980s to today, continues to target political activists, whistleblowers, journalists, and others challenging government authority. Modern techniques include the use of social media monitoring, facial recognition technology, and data-mining programs, which have turned the surveillance state into something much more invasive and effective than it was during the height of COINTELPRO. What is now called Smart COINTELPRO uses these tools to track activists in real-time, predict protests before they happen, and neutralize opposition without anyone even knowing they are under surveillance. This development continues the historical legacy of COINTELPRO and signals that government agencies have, in fact, successfully adapted their repressive tactics to new, digital, and networked environments.

Smart COINTELPRO is alive and growing in the American system today. With the advances in technology and the expansion of surveillance tools, government agencies have continued their efforts to neutralize political dissent, whether it’s through monitoring activists on social media or using high-tech equipment to track and disrupt protests. The legacy of COINTELPRO has become a cautionary tale in the digital age, as we continue to grapple with the balance between national security and civil liberties. For those seeking political change or social justice, history has shown that the struggle against a deeply entrenched surveillance state is not a new phenomenon. It remains, instead, an ongoing battle for the preservation of democratic freedoms in an age of increasing technological control.

The Emergence of "Smart COINTELPRO" Scalar Weapons: A Modern Tool of Political Repression

The term "Smart COINTELPRO" refers to a modern iteration of the FBI's COINTELPRO operations from the 1960s and 1970s, which sought to neutralize political activists and organizations deemed threats to national security. Unlike the earlier COINTELPRO, which relied on traditional methods such as infiltration, disinformation, and overt harassment, Smart COINTELPRO utilizes advanced, covert technologies that inflict psychological and physical harm without detection. This new form of surveillance and repression is carried out through directed energy weapons, satellite surveillance, and electromagnetic radiation (frequencies(3920–3935 MHz)), and targets political activists, human rights advocates, and whistleblowers. The goal is to undermine dissent through subtle, long-term psychological torture and neurological damage—often without the victims' knowledge. This practice has been meticulously documented by experts and whistleblowers like Dr. Robert Duncan and Dr. John Hall, who argue that these operations are not only real but also part of a systemic effort to silence opposition to the status quo.

Dr. Robert Duncan: Whistleblower on Directed Energy Weapons

Dr. Robert Duncan, a former CIA contractor and an expert in non-lethal weapons technology, has been one of the most vocal critics of these covert operations. In his writings and interviews, Duncan describes how the intelligence community uses electromagnetic fields and microwave radiation to create psychological and neurological effects in targeted individuals. According to Duncan, these technologies can remotely monitor and manipulate brain activity, inducing a range of symptoms such as anxiety, confusion, insomnia, and severe cognitive disruption. Importantly, these effects are often mistaken for mental illness, which allows the perpetrators to easily dismiss the victims' claims as the result of "schizophrenia" or paranoia. By doing so, intelligence agencies can avoid public scrutiny and accountability for the harm they inflict on individuals who are deemed political threats (Duncan, 2010).

Dr. John Hall: Testimony on Satellite and Drone Surveillance

Dr. John Hall, a Texas-based physician and author of A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America, provides further confirmation of the existence of Smart COINTELPRO and its use of directed energy weapons. Hall explains that the technologies used in these covert operations can be deployed from satellites, drones, or cellphone towers. These attacks are often invisible, with no external signs of interference or intrusion. Victims commonly report symptoms such as severe headaches, tinnitus, memory loss, and the sensation of voices being placed directly into their heads through "voice-to-skull" (V2K) technology. These symptoms are so subtle and silent that the victims often struggle to identify the source of the attack. This makes the psychological torture chronic and isolating, and over time, the cumulative effects of these technologies can lead to permanent neurological impairment (Hall, 2014).

The Political and Social Consequences of Smart COINTELPRO

The impact of Smart COINTELPRO extends beyond individual harm; it also has significant political and social ramifications. The intelligence agencies are able to target individuals for their political views, their involvement in social movements, or their role as whistleblowers. These individuals are subjected to prolonged psychological manipulation and even brain damage, yet the methods used leave no visible evidence of harassment. Consequently, victims often find themselves accused of mental illness, making it nearly impossible to defend against the attacks. Directed energy weapons and satellite surveillance technologies are especially effective in this regard because they can operate without detection by both the victim and external observers, providing a powerful tool for discrediting the target and avoiding legal or public scrutiny (Duncan, 2010; Hall, 2014).

Gaslighting and the Use of Mental Illness as a Defense

A core strategy in Smart COINTELPRO is the use of gaslighting to discredit victims. The original COINTELPRO operations relied heavily on disinformation campaigns to label political activists as mentally unstable or as threats to national security. Today, this strategy has evolved into a more covert form of psychological manipulation. Instead of relying on physical force or public smear campaigns, intelligence agencies now deploy advanced technologies that induce symptoms resembling mental illness. These symptoms are often misunderstood or ignored, allowing the perpetrators to maintain plausible deniability. As both Duncan and Hall assert, this gaslighting is not a legitimate explanation for the suffering of targeted individuals, but rather a deliberate tactic used to conceal the true nature of these operations (Duncan, 2010; Hall, 2014).

The Challenge of Deniability: The Invisible Nature of Smart COINTELPRO

One of the most disturbing aspects of Smart COINTELPRO is its capacity for total deniability. Traditional forms of surveillance and harassment—such as wiretaps or physical infiltration—leave tangible evidence that can be uncovered through investigation. However, directed energy weapons and satellite surveillance are far more difficult to trace. These technologies are highly advanced and often produce effects that are invisible even to the victim. As a result, it is nearly impossible for targeted individuals to defend themselves against these attacks. Moreover, because the attacks are so subtle, the victims' experiences are often dismissed as symptoms of mental illness, further isolating them from potential support (Duncan, 2010). This lack of physical evidence makes it easy for the intelligence agencies to operate with impunity, and the prolonged, invisible nature of the attacks ensures that they can continue for years without attracting official concern.

The Covert Campaign to Suppress Political Dissent

Smart COINTELPRO represents a dangerous and sophisticated extension of historical surveillance and harassment programs used to suppress political activism. It is a real and documented phenomenon, not a conspiracy theory, and involves the use of advanced technologies—directed energy weapons, satellite surveillance, and electromagnetic radiation—to target individuals for their political beliefs. This covert campaign of repression, as described by whistleblowers like Dr. Robert Duncan and Dr. John Hall, is a systematic effort to silence dissent and neutralize threats to the established order. The fact that the intelligence community employs gaslighting and disinformation to cover up these operations only underscores the systemic nature of the abuse. It is crucial that society recognizes these methods for what they truly are: a covert technological campaign designed to prevent the free exchange of ideas and stifle political activism.

Electronic Tyranny is still Tyranny. The masts keep going up, about every 0.5 miles, they put up more masts. It is not about cellular reception, it is E-Tyranny.

References

1. Chavez, L. (2017). Surveillance and the Black Lives Matter Movement: The Role of Law Enforcement in Oppressing Dissent. Journal of Political Inquiry, 15(2), 124-145.


2. Cleaver, E. (2001). Soul on Ice. Black Classic Press.


3. Garrow, D. J. (1986). Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Harper & Row.


4. Garcia, M. (2019). The Politics of Protest: Anti-Vietnam War Movements and the FBI. University of California Press.


5. Harkinson, J. (2017). How the FBI Went After Standing Rock Protesters. Mother Jones. Retrieved from https://www.motherjones.com


6. Hernandez, D. (2020). Social Media and Surveillance: The FBI's New Tools for Infiltrating Movements. The New York Times, 12 June 2020.


7. Johnson, M. (2021). Surveillance and Civil Liberties: The Balance of Security and Freedom. Routledge.


8. Kerr, B. (2015). Phil Ochs: A Biography. W.W. Norton & Company


9. Manning, R. (2022). The Black Panther Party and the FBI: A History of Infiltration and Surveillance. University of Illinois Press.


10. Ochs, J. (2019). The Mamas and the Papas: A History. University of Michigan Press.


11. Sneed, L. (2020). The Assassination of Fred Hampton: The FBI's War Against the Black Panther Party. New Press.


12. Grateful Dead FBI Files. (2009). Jerry Garcia and the FBI Surveillance. National Archives.


13. Al Jazeera. (2019). Ilhan Omar and the Surveillance State: Tracking Political Dissent. Al Jazeera Investigations. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com


14. Duncan, R. (2010). The Matrix Deciphered. Dr. Robert Duncan.


15. Hall, J. (2014). A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America. Self-published.

-###-

Death Cult 1  Death Cult 2  Death Cult 3  Death Cult 4  Albertsons Vons Safeway GMOs  Trader Joe's GMOs  The Big Lie  Indigenous Americas  Israels Pre-Crime Assasinations  OpEdNews Censorship  Greenwashing  Fukushima Plumegate 2024  Hijacked Dissent  GM Biotech "Food"  U.S. Gov Black Ops  Agricultural Collapse Starvation Imminent  Secret Police Rising  Authoritarianism  Free Speech Suppression 2024  Ministry of Truth  Tracy Turner Author's Page  Bing Bill Gates Censorship  Hollywood Hypocrisy  U.S./Israeli Death Cult  Evolution Secret Police  Evolution Free Speech Suppression  Gov. Newsom Greenwash  Biotech Gene Editing  Lavender AI Genocide  World Collapse

Tracy Turner was born into two extended families of bookworms - one horticultural and one petroleum industry. Semi-retired from IT, Corporate Analyst and Botanical Garden Plant Propagation. Among his many interests are all sciences, news, tracking political corruption, national and world events (corruption). Urges you to ask several USA IT professionals about web censorship; which is becoming rampant. Twitter, Facebook and Myspace are not free speech - they are places of monitoring, censoring and personal data harvesting. Also, just because you see your words in print online, it does not equate to "free speech". Do you believe Google and Bing blacklist Michael Taylor's online words as often as said censors blacklist your online "free speech"? If you love freedom, become active in corruption watch, exposure; free speech and freedom of the press activism.

SMART AI COINTELPRO: The FBI War on Civil Rights Fomenting Agitation and the Erosion of Liberties 2025 © 2025 www.olivebiodiesel.com. All rights reserved.
https://olivebiodiesel.com/fbi-cointelpro-historical-context-and-impact-civil-rights-movement-political-surveillance.html