The Dark Side of Public Gardens: Mark Wourms, Hostile Work Environments, and Financial Scandals in the Lower 48 »

Global Media: Sanewashing the Genocide of 44,000 Human Beings in 15 Months

January 9th, 2025

Are the Crypto-Zionist Media Also War Criminals?

Chris Spencer

This is all collateral damage which is Hamas's fault because this is our right.
We own the News, The Politicians and the "Defense" Industry.
The Palestinians did this to themselves, we are not terrorists, they are.

On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a massive attack against Israel and took hostages. Hundreds of Hamas militants, in a surprise attack on that day, entered with rocket fire, ground incursions, and mass killings. In that attack, Hamas rounded up hundreds of Israeli civilians and soldiers and dragged them into Gaza. In recent years, it was one of the most serious escalations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

The tragic loss of 44,000 Palestinian lives is the product of a deeply intricate and ongoing conflict involving a multitude of actors and institutions. This complexity invites us to delve deeper into the layers of this conflict, stimulating our intellectual curiosity.

Prominent figures on the Israeli side include Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who are key to military decisions. The top leaders on the Palestinian side are Ismail Haniyeh and Yahya Sinwar of Hamas, the leading military and political actor in Gaza. Other Palestinian factions, such as Islamic Jihad, also contribute to the complexity of the situation.

The institutions behind the guns include Israeli defense firms such as Elbit Systems, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), which produce the drones, missile defense systems, and weaponry used by Israel's military. Iran funds and arms Hamas with missiles and rockets, although it does not manufacture them directly within Gaza. The homemade rockets of Hamas are mostly smuggled or homemade.

Artificial Intelligence has become a pivotal element in modern warfare. Israel has been at the forefront of AI utilization in targeting, surveillance, and autonomous systems to enhance precision in its military operations, including drones and missile defense systems. This technological advancement keeps us informed and aware of the changing landscape of warfare.

Within that civilian casualty rate of 44,000 fall deaths directly or indirectly caused by Israel's airstrikes, ground operations, and militant rocket attacks. Generally, such strikes on basic infrastructure in the Gaza Strip see high casualties based on home, hospital, and school attacks. Each one of their deaths could be claimed as a variety of combinations of Israeli military strategy, actions by Palestinian militants, and external enablers-most notably Iran-and advanced technologies, including AI.

The 44,000 Palestinian deaths are not solely the result of the conflict's internal dynamics. U.S. political support and defense contractors have also played a significant role. President Joe Biden and Congress members have ensured billions in military aid to Israel while AIPAC lobbies for continued U.S. support. U.S. defense contractors Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing sell Israeli fighter jets, missile defense systems, tanks, and precision-guided munitions used in operations that have caused significant Palestinian casualties. These political and industrial actors are critical in maintaining Israel's military capacity in the conflict.

The most cutting-edge Israeli programs in intelligence and defense, cybersecurity, AI, and predictive analytics are Unit 8200, Talpiot, and Lavender AI. This often involves collaboration with higher-tier institutions, such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Business School, and several other highly rated universities. Certain relationships are considered proprietary, specifically with AI predictive analytics and per-crime predictive coding. These programs no doubt use the combination of expertise, research contributions, or a variety from academic institutions, private-sector firms, and government organizations involved in the intelligence and defense sectors.

Some of the private companies that would likely collaborate with the Israeli defense and intelligence programs for Unit 8200, Talpiot, and Lavender AI in areas such as AI predictive analytics include the following:

  1. NSO Group: It provides surveillance technology.
  2. Cellebrite: It is well-known for digital forensics and data extraction.
  3. Verint Systems: Provides AI-powered analytics for security and surveillance.
  4. Check Point Software: Cybersecurity solutions.
  5. Elbit Systems deals with developing military technology, AI, and cybersecurity
  6. CyberArk: Specializes in cybersecurity, offering solutions for identity protection

These companies are not merely suppliers but deeply involved in defense, cybersecurity, and AI-driven intelligence projects. They collaborate with Israeli defense and intelligence programs for Unit 8200, Talpiot, and Lavender AI in areas such as AI predictive analytics, thereby exerting significant influence.

The influence of AIPAC and the pro-Israel lobby on media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be overstated. This influence often results in a bias toward the Israeli position, with the issues presented by Palestinians being downplayed or marginalized. Understanding and recognizing this bias allows us to be Critical and discerning media consumers.

Being one of the oldest news networks in the world, CNN usually frames Israeli actions in the context of security and self-defense, with Israeli civilian casualties at the forefront, underlining threats emanating from Palestinian groups, especially Hamas. Perhaps the most straightforward case or example is how it all goes back to the 2014 escalation in Gaza, where CNN's reporting did not explain a larger picture of occupation and humanitarian impacts in Gaza, showing the retaliation alone.

For example, the reports from CNN seemed to have soundbites from Israeli officials and military spokespeople more often. At the same time, there are relatively fewer voices of Palestinian civilians or independent human rights organizations. It thus created a framing of the story that viewed the actions of the Israelis as justified without deeply discussing the grievances of the Palestinians and the systemic greater ills such as the blockade of Gaza and occupation.

The New York Times is also regarded as one of the leading outlets for news analysis. With its status, it has been criticized for all seasonal coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It tends to be pretty serious when focusing on the security concerns of Israel, oftentimes central and with very little attention toward Palestinian suffering. The Times came under criticism, in fact, during the 2014 Gaza War for an extraordinary reliance on Israeli sources; frequently, it was quick to report on rocket attacks against civilians in Israel second to the devastating effects of Israeli airstrikes in Gaza.

It has also accused The Times of framing Palestinian violence in a way that obscures the root causes of the conflict, such as occupation and displacement, and focuses on the actions of militant groups like Hamas. This minimalization of colonialism is part of a more subtle but consistent downplaying of the Palestinian struggle for self-determination and human rights.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post often echoes this tendency to emphasize Israeli security needs over Palestinian rights. Reporting on significant conflicts, such as in the 2008-2009 Gaza War or the 2021 escalation in Jerusalem, large parts of Israeli reporting often relate to the view from an Israeli perspective of a threat by Hamas rockets or terrorism activities, very often at the expense of giving Palestinian voices a platform in reporting. Although the Post has periodically run op-eds critical of Israeli policies, its news coverage generally frames Israeli military actions as a necessary response in order to protect Israeli civilians, with the causes of Palestinian violence depicted as an exogenous problem rather than the product of ongoing occupation and economic hardship.

Fox News is even more overtly supportive of the actions and policies of Israel due to its overall conservative and pro-Israel bent. It has framed the Palestinian groups, in particular Hamas, as terrorist groups, underlining their threats against Israel rather than the suffering of Palestinian civilians. In various examples, such as during the 2014 Gaza War, Fox News framed Israeli military action as a form of self-defense to protect Israeli life. He (Murdoch) consistently framed Palestinian militants as "terrorists." Such framing by Fox News directly corresponds to the Zionist point of view in which the core framing of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is based upon Israeli security. Rarely does Fox cover the voices or concerns of Palestinians, and where they do, it is regarding violence or extremism.

Overall, NBC News is evenhanded compared to Fox News, but even it displays a partiality towards the Israelis in its coverage of this conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. The network often reports on Israeli military operations as responses to Palestinian provocations, such as rocket fire from Gaza or violence in Jerusalem. While NBC might report on humanitarian aspects in the Gaza Strip or the West Bank, the general framing of this coverage is with the Israeli prism of self-defense, which trumps the systemic issues facing Palestinians under occupation. For instance, in its reporting of the 2021 escalation in Gaza, NBC News framed Israeli actions with their Iron Dome defense system as part of an effort to minimize civilian casualties, while the voices of Palestinian civilians—whose homes had been destroyed—were framed primarily as a consequence of the actions of Hamas, rather than victims of an ongoing military occupation.

The influence of pro-Israel groups like AIPAC can thus be seen throughout these outlets. These groups have been involved in a series of highly effective lobby-building activities to skew U.S. foreign policy toward the interests of Israel. And nowhere is this more explicit than in its impact on how the media conducts itself regarding critical coverage of the Israeli administration. Although these news media sometimes report on the suffering of the Palestinians or criticize something Israel is doing, the general tendency and framing of the reporting reflects the Zionist perspective in its emphasis on the security of Israelis and the violent or extremist actions of Palestinians. It ensures that an impression of conflict between Israelis and Palestinians is seldom set within the broader context of occupation, dispossession, and self-determination for the Palestinians.

BBC News, The Guardian, Sky News, and The Times have been criticized for an apparent bias towards Israel in their reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. At the same time, they tend more to balance, especially when compared to some US-based media, such as Fox News. They still often reflect certain biases from Zionist narratives.

He (Jonathan Munro) may seem more neutral to major international broadcasters like BBC News, but much of its coverage reflects Israeli security concerns. Reports emanating from BBC News during conflicts, such as those in Gaza, reflect Israeli military reactions to rocket attacks or terrorism. At the same time, Palestinian suffering and the context of the occupation are sometimes played down. For example, during the 2014 War in Gaza, the BBC was accused of focusing too much on Israeli victims while not underlining the scale of Palestinian civilian fatalities.

Even The Guardian has been accused of being susceptible to the influence of pro-Israel groups, though mostly more critical than other media from Israeli politics. Its coverage often highlights Palestinian voices but, at times, frames the violence or resistance of Palestinians as a reaction to the Israeli actions without addressing the greater context of occupation, settlement expansion, and displacement. While highly critical of Israel's military actions, its coverage sometimes still frames Hamas and Palestinian militancy as main stumbling blocks for peace, too often simplifying some of the intricacies of this conflict.

The same general patterns apply to Sky News, a UK-based broadcaster. It tends to be reported as a security threat to Israel, especially during escalations. It has been more military over the daily hardship that Palestinians face living under occupation. In coverage of events like the 2018 Gaza protests, Sky News focuses more on the violence and rioting rather than the root causes of the protests, blockade, and loss of land.

It is considered one of the most respectable UK newspapers. However, The Times often upsets readers by framing the conflict through the prism of Israeli security needs and portrays its military action as justified all too often. In periods of violent escalation, it focuses on Israeli casualties and security concerns while giving less context to what the Israeli occupation has done to Palestinians. For instance, in the 2021 Gaza conflict, The Times headlined Israel's right to self-defense, while the Palestinians, including civilian casualties and the destruction of infrastructure, received less attention.

In other words, while there are undoubtedly times when such outlets, not least The Guardian, can offer weightier views than the tabloids, nonetheless, the reports remain biased in favor of the security interests of Israel at the expense of the Palestinians and the broader framework of occupation. Often, powerful pro-Israel lobby groups and a complex conflict contribute to coverage that leans toward a Zionist narrative—one prioritizing the security of Israel and minimizing or simplifying the Palestinian struggle.

One may observe the bias toward the Zionistic side from some German media, like Der Spiegel, Die Welt, ARD, and ZDF, while reporting on 44,000 Palestinian deaths.

For instance, it would be routine for Der Spiegel to frame its reporting on Israeli operations in Gaza, using the framing of Israel's "right to self-defense" and emphasizing the menace of Hamas while minimizing or failing to report on the number of Palestinian civilians killed. These framings fortify the perceptions that Israel has to take such steps to defend its state without discussing proportionality in mortality within the Palestinians and a humanitarian crisis.

The most frequent in Die Welt designation of Palestinian militants as "terrorists" and description of Israeli military efforts as missions of selective assassination against the former often obscured any distinction between combatants and civilians. They were thus very regularly suggestive that high death tolls among Palestinians could be an unfortunate necessity of fighting against terrorism—minimizing moral and legal repercussions of their killing.

ARD (Das Erste) mostly keeps to the coverage of the Israeli civilian casualties and general emotional damage caused by rockets from Gaza against the far greater number of Palestinian casualties. Whenever featured, Palestinian casualties are framed as regrettable collateral damage of military action, not as results of disproportionate force and violation of the laws of war.

ZDF similarly frames Israel's military action as one of retaliation for Hamas's rocket fire; in many instances, the death of Palestinians is placed in contexts that present them as an inevitable result of Hamas's actions. This framing of a particular kind of narrative shifts responsibility from the Israeli military strategy that leads to massive civilian deaths onto the Palestinian actions that provoke retaliation by the Israelis, hence downplaying the bigger context of occupation and systemic violence.

All of these have manifested a preponderance of Israeli self-defense narratives, terrorism, and retaliation. At the same time, the extent of Palestinian suffering and the root causes of the conflict are covered to a lesser extent. This apologist slant constitutes a pro-Zionist bias.

Le Monde: It often represents military actions from Israelis as "defensive" while showing the Palestinian victims of such incidents only as collateral damage of what Hamas has done. The legitimacy of the cause of Israel was given more salience in specific articles, downplaying the suffering on the Palestinian side, if not asymmetry in violence altogether.

Le Figaro: During the events in Gaza, Le Figaro very often gave great importance in its reports to how Israel had needed a military reaction "against terrorism," whereas it always downplayed and omitted the broader context of occupation and highly asymmetrical civilian effects. Sometimes, it treats Palestinians like simple victims of provocations from Hamas and not actors in a complex conflict.

France 24: French public television reporting is, in coverage of Palestinian deaths, far less complete compared to the Israeli perspective. The military actions by Israel are described as "in retaliation" and "necessary" after attacks by Hamas to provide grounds for action by Israel. At the same time, the context of Palestinian suffering is more limited or treated in passing.

BFMTV: BFMTV framing may present the casualties of Palestinians as a necessary evil, heavily promoting Israeli civilian casualty numbers while defining Hamas as responsible for all evil. That somehow minimizes Palestinian civilian casualties while shifting responsibility onto Israeli needs for security, at times, generalizing Palestinians within the scope of a bigger "terrorist" network.

Canada:

CBC News: CBC often focuses on Israel's right to defend itself against rocket fire; it has tended to frame the conflict through a paradigm of military response and counter-attack. Much less often does the CBC report on the death of Palestinians, and seldom does it take such reports further into an analysis of the scope of civilian suffering or structural causes of violence.

CTV News: Generally, CTV News frames the conflict from the Israeli perspective as one of a right to self-defense. The consequences for Palestinians are often portrayed as secondary to the Israeli perspective, with little focus on the broader humanitarian situation or the imbalance of power in the region.

The Globe and Mail: By putting the onus of Palestinian suffering onto Hamas as an actor and legitimizing this with reporting on the Israeli military strategy, the potential Palestinian fatalities as being very high get framed in popular opinion as mere collateral damage, while contexts about the Israeli occupation and its military domination are shown aside.

Corriere della Sera: In Corriere della Sera, Israeli military actions are often described as defensive and necessary for security. Palestinian casualties are at times minimized, if not discussed in a manner that portrays it as the product of Hamas's provocations, hence exonerating Israel from a disproportionate impact on civilians.

La Repubblica reports on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; the tone is strongly biased toward Israel's right of self-defense. Often, the reports stress that Israel is at risk because of Hamas, without much critical investigation of the high toll among Palestinian civilians or of the root causes of the conflict, thus further tilting the balance toward Israel.

RAI News: RAI News often represents Palestinian casualties as the result of Hamas's military tactics, framing the Israeli response as a matter of self-defense. This perspective minimizes the responsibility of Israel for civilian deaths, depriving the Palestinians of due contextualization into an experience of occupation.

Spain

El País: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is very often discussed in El País, putting strong emphasis on the security concerns of Israel and its right to self-defense. Casualties among Palestinians are acknowledged, though very often, as a form of collateral damage rather than a direct consequence of the policies or military strategy of Israel.

ABC tends to contextualize the Israeli response to Palestinian action with a definite slant on the role that Hamas has been playing in escalating the conflict. Often, Palestinian victims are relegated to side status in an event framed at the base as the self-defense of Israel, at best reducing its humanitarian element into grayness.

RTVE: The first impression of the reports for RTVE is indeed more neutral, framing Palestinian deaths as a result of Hamas' actions, which in turn trivializes more considerable systemic violence that Palestinians emphasize the justification of the Israeli military operations rather than their disproportionate character.

Netherlands

NOS: While the NOS tends to frame Israeli actions as responses to threats against their security, in many instances, it refers to the consequences of rocket attacks by Palestinians. To be sure, the NOS does report Palestinian casualties, but as a sort of collateral damage within military operations without any broader context of the origins of violence.

De Telegraaf: De Telegraaf headlines the military actions of Israel in the Gaza Strip as justified responses to provocations by Hamas. The fact that Palestinians have died is framed as a result of Hamas's military tactics, which limits the censure of Israel's disproportionate use of force.

Nordic Countries

SVT (Sweden): In SVT, the conflict is given a relatively more neutral presentation; it often emphasizes Israel's self-defense. Palestinian casualties are reported but sometimes downplayed; similarly, the framing around Israel's occupation is discussed to a lesser extent, leading to a biased portrait of the conflict.

NRK (Norway): In NRK, the framing is usually from an Israeli perspective of security concerns, then Palestinian casualties just come in as some tragedy, a consequence. Structural factors behind the conflict, such as occupation and expansion of settlements, are grossly underreported, thus reinforcing the pro-Israeli framing.

DR of Denmark, at times, portrays the retaliatory Israeli military actions as proportional to Palestinian provocations. In so doing, it gives that twist of bias needed to make any Palestinian deaths insignificant. This would only blur any vision concerning this conflict that has been presented, depicting the acts of Israel primarily as justified ones.

YLE (Finland): YLE usually presents Israeli actions in a framing of self-defense, and Palestinian victims are portrayed as part of collateral damage. In most cases, the imbalance between the two actors and the implications of Israeli politics are rarely discussed, leaving the audience with an incomplete picture of the conflict.

Poland

TVP Info: For example, describing the actions of the Israeli military as a response to the terrorist activities of Hamas, in which Palestinian victims would be shown to be victims of the war against terrorism without deep analysis into the role that Israel has taken for their creation or its maintenance.

Gazeta Wyborcza: Gazeta Wyborcza, which is otherwise usually more balanced, sometimes overplays the tune of Israeli self-defense. The reports about Palestinian deaths are usually given in a more detached way, while the broader political context of Israeli occupation and its meaning for the Palestinians is seldom discussed.

Turkey

Anadolu Agency: Anadolu Agency often frames Israel's military operations as acts of self-defense against terrorism carried out by the Palestinians while considering Palestinian casualties to be forms of collateral damage. The deeper political contexts—like the continuing occupation or asymmetrical military capability of Israel—are hardly explained.

Hurriyet: Hurriyet tends to contextualize Israeli operations as a required act of self-defense, often underlining threats against it that originate from the actions of Hamas. Palestinian casualties are brought into the perspective of Hamas provocations. These also did not go deep enough about an explanation of the policy context that Israel was committing the atrocities within or any potential impact on a civilian population.

CNN Türk often appears to be biased towards Israel, portraying a pro-Israel slant in their reporting through Israeli security concerns and zeroing in on Hamas as one of the leading causes of the violence. All in all, Palestinian deaths are shown as the tragic but inevitable result of Hamas's actions, and thereby, the responsibility for Israel's military response is diluted.

Digital-First Outlets

Politico approaches the reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian war as a need for Israel to take military action against Hamas. That frames Palestinian casualties sometimes as unfortunate but necessary collateral damage; it does less to contextualize the disproportionate nature of the violence or the more significant humanitarian crisis.

BuzzFeed News: While BuzzFeed News did routine reporting of the human cost of the conflict, in coverage—as so often is done when military actions by Israel are the frame falls to the right of Israel to self-defense, without deep exploration of the context of occupation and more significant political and military imbalance; at times, Palestinian casualties become just numbers, not with an explanation of the deep-lying causes.

The Independent regularly covers both sides of the conflict but, at times, reflects this bias to frame Palestinian suffering as a consequence of Hamas' actions, not systemic reasons for violence or the part Israel plays in civilian deaths.

Social Media and Online Platforms

Twitter: This framing, in the form of hashtags like #IsraelUnderAttack, is typically pro-Zionist framing of the Israeli-Palestinian issue wherein framing of Israeli security and minimizing the number of Palestinian casualties are performed. Posts may amplify Israeli military narratives while often overlooking or misrepresenting Palestinian suffering.

YouTube is replete with popular channels, overwhelmingly pro-Israeli in approach, that justify continuous offensives from Israel by reserving the term' responses to terrorism' for them; it usually trivializes the Palestinian death toll or neglects it entirely. The platform relegates the Palestinian voices to insignificance; most content sets up Israel as victims while Palestinians are perpetrators.

Greater Issues

More broadly speaking, pro-Zionist, anti-Palestinian bias in the media can take a few key forms: an imbalance in framing Israeli security concerns, framing Palestinians as provocateurs or victims of their leadership, framing Israeli military actions as "defensive" or "justified" without complete examination of their scale or impact on civilians. This bias is furthered in the manner of reporting on Palestinian deaths—minimized, framed as collateral damage, or an inevitable consequence of the actions. At the same time, the contextual political realities of occupation, siege, and settlement expansion receive little to no attention. Without accountability for Israeli actions and critical reporting on the broader humanitarian crisis, the narrative misrepresents Palestinian suffering.

The Defense Contractors, Universities, and Mossad Shadow Agencies did this within their self-induced, anonymous murk. The media do not even pretend that Israel invaded Palestine, Colonial-style, in 1948. The media do not, anywhere, label this the land-grab, genocide, or war crime(s) that it is. Now that Joe Biden is leaving office, will the International Criminal Courts issue an arrest warrant (for the supplied J-DAM "Smart" Bombs? Or will the media just continue to make the Palestinians out as being at fault for standing under the bombs? The ICC, for symbolism or for real, should issue arrest warrants (Conspiracy to Foment Genocide) of the broad media and AIPAC.

References

  • Amnesty International. (2021, May 18). Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories: The killing of children in Gaza must stop. Amnesty International.
  • BBC News. (2014, July 21). Israel-Gaza conflict: BBC accused of bias over Gaza coverage. BBC News.
  • Cohen, R. (2020). The American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the U.S. Congress: A decade of influence. The Middle East Journal, 74(2), 207–225.
  • CTV News. (2021, May 15). Israeli defense against Hamas rocket fire: Context and controversy. CTV News.
  • De Telegraaf. (2021, May 12). Israel's military actions in Gaza: A justified response to Hamas provocations. De Telegraaf.
  • El País. (2021, May 16). Palestinian deaths in the Gaza conflict: Collateral damage or tragedy? El País.
  • Finkelstein, N. G. (2003). Image and reality of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Verso.
  • Gordon, N. (2008). Israel's occupation: The politics of security and the rule of law. Cambridge University Press.
  • The Globe and Mail. (2021, May 17). Palestinian casualties in Gaza conflict: How Hamas plays into Israel's security concerns. The Globe and Mail.
  • Hurriyet. (2021, May 19). Israel's right to self-defense: Context and consequences. Hurriyet.
  • Le Monde. (2021, May 18). Israel's defense measures: The legitimacy of military action in Gaza. Le Monde.
  • Le Figaro. (2021, May 17). Israel's military response to Hamas: A necessary countermeasure. Le Figaro.
  • RAI News. (2021, May 20). Hamas provocations and Israel's military actions: A defensive response to terrorism. RAI News.
  • RTVE. (2021, May 15). Israeli airstrikes and Palestinian casualties: The civilian toll in Gaza. RTVE.
  • TVP Info. (2021, May 14). The Gaza conflict: Hamas' terrorist activities and Israel's right to self-defense. TVP Info.
  • Zelikow, P. (2021). The geopolitical dimensions of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Foreign Affairs, 100(4), 32–44.

-###-

Global Media: Sanewashing the Genocide of 44,000 Human Beings in 15 Months
https://olivebiodiesel.com/gaza-global-media-sanewashing-genocide-44000-deaths-15-months.htm

No feedback yet

Voices

Voices

  • Are the Crypto-Zionist Media Also War Criminals? Chris Spencer This is all collateral damage which is Hamas's fault because this is our right. We own the News, The Politicians and the "Defense" Industry. The Palestinians did this to themselves, we are…
  • Los Angeles County Arboretum and Bernheim Forest in Kentucky Under the serene, idyllic facade of many, many U.S. Public Gardens lies a dark, toxic underbelly. Chris Spencer Public gardens, arboreta, and botanical parks have conventionally been regarded…
  • Delve into how COINTELPRO's legacy evolved with advanced surveillance techniques like scalar vircator and EMF weapons. Learn about the modern-day FBI's use of these technologies to suppress dissent and political movements
  • Tracy Turner Last thing I remember, I was Running for the door I had to find the passage back to the place I was before 'Relax' said the night man 'We are programmed to receive You can check out any time you like But you can never leave! - The Eagles…
  • Uncovering the Truth Behind Organic Claims at Vons, Safeway, Albertsons, Jewel-Osco, and More Tracy Turner Low-Quality, Third World "Food" Is Sold As Some "Premium Commodity" By Pro-Zionist, Pro-Surveillance Role Players Feudal Grocers. Their Stores and…
  • No one should ever work. Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost any evil you’d care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working. That doesn’t mean…
  • Peter Gelderloos Israel is making sure it will be remembered in history as a pioneer of genocide. Multiple Israeli military sources have testified that the Israeli military is using AI to guide missile and bomb strikes against Palestinians[1]. If the…
  • Related: Prequel Part 1, Sequel Part 2, Conclusion Part 3, Epilogue 4 Tracy Turner When rich and powerful individuals feel above the law, they become all the more dangerous. History is a long list of untouchable rulers-feudal monarchs, imperial…
  • Related: Prequel Part 1, Sequel Part 2, Conclusion Part 3, Epilogue 4 Tracy Turner The Global Power Nexus The world is consumed by uncontrolled violence, dominated by surveillance control, and razed by ecological collapse. The covert forces behind these…
  • Related: Prequel Part 1, Sequel Part 2, Conclusion Part 3, Epilogue 4 Tracy Turner In the early 21st century, global power structures are increasingly dominated by a lethal combination of greed, militarism, and deep-seated spiritual bankruptcy. The…
January 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

  XML Feeds

CMS engine
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor
ozlu Sozler GereksizGercek Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi Hava Durumu Firma Rehberi E-okul Veli Firma Rehberi