Fred Gransville

67,000 Dead in 16 Months: The Inarguable Truth of Israel's Global Zionist Death Cult

The killing of 67,000 Palestinians in Gaza in the last 16 months, primarily due to Israeli Talpiot Lavender AI military operations, presents an obvious, unsettling picture: a state that has embraced a mindset representative of a death cult. Death Cult is not rhetoric or speculation but based on the shocking scale of death, destruction, and systematic dehumanization.

The woman with red hair from one of the sitcoms was in the news tonight, she was defending Israel. She was complaining about all the hate mail. 67,000 dead, so that she can have a "precious state" that she won't live in. Debra Messing. Defending a State that she will not live in full-time. Are the 67,000 dead souls a "Religion," an Authoritarian Statist Dystopia or a Death Cult?

The mask of benevolence hides the fist of oppression.

And in continuance, it would not stop killing; the suffering has been incessant, and what's left of Gaza has come to symbolize an unbridled, staunchly uncompromising ideology of destruction. Maybe more disturbingly, this becomes a genocide quite beyond human bombs or drones. It's fast assuming the dimensions of a technologized machine driven by AI power to target human life with uncanny efficiency, almost as a cult of 21st-century death.

The World Mass Media is a complicit culprit of the genocide and ethnic cleansing. They put into print that genocide and ethnic cleansing are "extraordinarily high tensions." These are the mainstream (Zionist) media's euphemisms for ethnic cleansing genocide: 

• Blockade or Siege
• Operation or Military Operation
• Extraordinarily High Tensions
• Casualties or Loss of life
• Collateral Damage
• Unrest
• Security Measures

These terms refer to the people killed or injured in the conflict via the Talpiot Lavender AI Genocide. My favorite genocide ethnic cleansing euphemism is "unrest." It is such Sanewashing.

To understand what's happening today in Gaza, one must first grapple with the very notion of a "death cult." Cults, whether religious, ideological, or political, tend to share one dangerous feature: an obsession with sacrifice, particularly human sacrifice, to achieve a more significant cause. The Israeli political and military leadership's treatment of Palestinian lives--and Gaza in particular--echoes this. The logic of the state, which is supported and justified by the most hardcore Zionists, is that the survival and expansion of Israel outweigh the cost of Palestinian life. The destruction of Gaza, which has now become a sprawling ruin, is not collateral damage. It is the aim.

The transformation of Israel into a death cult is not merely a philosophical or moral abstraction. The methods employed reveal an ideology that seems designed to destroy. The Israeli military's recent use of AI-driven systems, especially from elite projects like Talpiot and the Lavender AI targeting system, makes this much more straightforward. These systems can identify and target humans with unprecedented precision, reducing life to mere coordinates. 

The artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in place are now capable of identifying "hard-kill" targets--individuals deemed to be threats (often teenagers, women, and even children)--and “neutralizing them” with shocking accuracy. What once was a more human-led military system has evolved into a cold, calculating machine of destruction. Lavender AI Talpiot (Harvard Business Computing School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is pre-crime assassination, killing people before "they might" commit a crime. 

Of course, this, too, has a euphemism, "Predictive Analytics." Pre-Crime Executions is a more deserved noun phrase.

There is an entire dictionary of ethnic cleansing genocide euphemisms.

In mainstream press coverage of Gaza, the terms "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" are often avoided due to their highly charged and legally specific meanings. Instead, media outlets frequently use more neutral or descriptive language to characterize the situation. Here are some alternative phrases commonly used:

1. "Conflict" or "Ongoing Conflict"
2. "Humanitarian Crisis"
3. "Violence" or "Escalation of Violence"
4. "Civilian Casualties" or "Civilian Suffering"
5. "Displacement" or "Forced Displacement"
6. "Blockade" or "Siege"
7. "Military Operations" or "Airstrikes"
8. "Tensions" or "High Tensions"
9. "Civilians Caught in the Crossfire"
10. "Crisis" or "Regional Crisis"
11. "Destruction" or "Widespread Destruction"
12. "International Condemnation" or "Calls for Ceasefire"
13. "Human Rights Violations"
14. "War Crimes Allegations"

All noun phrases which deny War Crimes, Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide.

These AI genocide systems are not mere tools; they extend from the ethos of this death cult. In Gaza, they kill human beings efficiently and take each individual's life, along with the emotional and political weight sewn to every stitch, in such a fashion as to turn it all quite clinically chilling. The point here is this: It's much more than about war. It's about erasing the human aspect of conflict altogether, making the death of thousands seem like an unfortunate but necessary component of an unyielding techno-ideology. When you can eliminate human beings through machines without ever confronting the moral or emotional complexity of such actions, you create a system of dehumanization that mirrors that of past totalitarian regimes.

Of course, this is equally relevant to understanding the mindset of the death cult and is, in fact, inextricably linked with the philosophy underpinning the Israeli military approach to Palestinians. 

Hardcore Zionists believe in the absolute righteousness of their mission: Israel as a divine and historical entitlement, which has to be maintained, no matter the cost. In that belief, they are obstacles to that entitlement, to be swept away, either forcibly or by removal from the collective consciousness. To them, the massacre of Palestinians is not a tragic consequence but rather an inevitability of this conflict. And that goes hand in hand with the nihilism responsible for fueling death cults: the denial of the sanctity of human life, or for that matter, of life itself being something worthwhile.

In this context, nihilism doesn't manifest so much in negating meaning but embracing destruction for an abstract and absolute goal. The Israeli state and the hardcore Zionist ideologues who support it view the deaths of Palestinians not as tragic but as a necessary, indeed virtuous, sacrifice in the name of creating a Zionist state that will, at last, be unassailable and eternal. It's a worldview where the end justifies whatever means, no matter how brutal. In that context, the deaths of 67,000 people in Gaza would become an unfortunate necessity in the ruthless, ideologically driven calculus that leads to such a conclusion.

To understand this best, one has to go back in history to various totalitarian movements that embraced death as a form of purification or ideological change. For example, the Nazi regime regarded the death of several millions as not an abomination but rather purifying the world and securing the racial future for the Aryan people. 

The murders of Jews, Gays, Intellectuals and Romani people, among others, had been contextualized as exigent to the higher aim of the creation of an empire free from "undesirables." Similarly, killings in Gaza present the murders of Palestinians as necessary for the need to maintain sovereignty. The number of deaths became incomprehensibly great, not only war casualties but also the starting of systematic attempts at eliminating life unworthy of living.

We also see here the authoritarian roots within the military and political leadership of Israel. This authoritarianism is well revealed through a dictatorial mindset, whereby there is the tendency to have this power restive in the few who use force to validate some inflexible idea.

Dissent is stifled, and no negotiations are to be sought- only the compelling need to overpower, dominate, or control. The presence of death as a tool of control--embodied in the daily killings, demolition of homes, and targeting of civilian infrastructure--speaks to the political culture of Israeli leaders, for whom power is an end in itself, no matter how it is achieved.

The attitude of Israel towards Gaza fits the definition of societal collapse. The destruction of an entire people is irrelevant; a whole city has been wiped out, and an entire generation has been erased systematically; in that case, the moral compass of a society has shattered. To that degree, Gaza represents the collapse of any humanistic values that should underpin governance. It is a society in which life is cheap, violence a tool of political will, and the destruction of others is not an aberration but a planned objective.

The destruction of Gaza and the massacre of its people might also be comprehended through a "demolition zone." For Israel, Gaza is not a home to millions of people with histories, cultures, and dreams; it was a test area for its ability to determine life and death. It means that the whole Gaza Strip is being turned into an area with the densest population, which as a whole will serve as the ideal site to exercise, polish, and consummate Israel's gruesome notion of statehood. Palestinians, therefore, become subjects of experiments and get entirely dehumanized. 

Every killing serves as a means toward this end-every bombing; every city block flattened, serves to intimate just how easily the people are erased. Added to this is the unsettling trend of adding AI targeting systems that can make autonomous decisions about who will live and who will die.

The symbolism is powerful. Gaza is not just a place of conflict; it shows how a state can render whole people as nothing and take away their identity, their humanity, and their future. For the hardcore Zionists of Israel, the razing of Gaza is not merely an act of self-defense, as they would maintain, but rather a symbolic purification, a means of cleansing the land for what they firmly believe is its rightful, God-given owner--Israel. In this imagining, the Palestinians are dispensable, and their deaths justify a higher ideological purpose.

The historical parallels with other death cults are unmistakable. The Nazi regime's policy of racial purity led to the murders of millions of Jews, Romani, and others who were seen as "undesirable." For the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, death became the tool to renew society by purging the old world for a new "perfect" one. So, too, have Israel's hardcore Zionists, their totalitarian mindset rivaled only by their nihilism about the population of Palestinians, embraced the idea that death is not just a cost of war but a necessary evil in service to a state that believes itself above moral reproach.

The 67,000 dead Palestinians are not statistics. They are witness to an ideology of power and domination alone, wherein death is a means to that very power. From bombs to AI-powered targeting systems, the machinery of death has grown so sophisticated that one thing has become clear: for hardcore Zionists, Palestinian deaths have stopped being a tragic byproduct of war. It is an intrinsic part of their vision of a Zionist state to which no obstacle or hindrance can or will be tolerated.

The evidence cannot be disputed. The claim that Israel and hardcore Zionists have become a death cult is no hyperbole. Still, it's a cold fact reflected in what has happened with the destruction ongoing in Gaza, and with which the bloodshed will further go on unless this ideology ends. The killing of 67,000 Palestinians is not something that can be judged in isolation. It is the direct translation of an ideology without sanctity for life. The death cult is alive, and it is dictating the future not only of Gaza but of the entire region. The death toll in Gaza- 67,000 Palestinians killed in 16 months is not just a statistic.

It is a grotesque monument to the logic of annihilation, starkly reminding us that when the machinery of death is linked with political ideology, what it produces is incomprehensible. The Talpiot program has long been a source of pride for the state: Israel's elite military-technological incubator churns out cutting-edge AI systems and precision weaponry. 

But it is when such tools are applied to human targets, lavender AI turns into a killing machine, and the algorithms mark the difference between life and death that we are no longer talking about defense but about something different. We're talking of a death cult. The death cult is not just a killing outfit; it is also the sanctification of killing, an outfit draping itself in survivalist rhetoric, with destruction as its credo.

The most extreme manifestation of Zionism has degenerated into just such a cult. It's not a homeland for the Jews; it is about erasing the Other, making Gaza a demolition zone, reducing life to rubble, and naming its victory. The 67,000 dead are not collateral damage; they are the sacrifice this cult demands, the blood offering on the altar of ethno-nationalist purity. Historically, death cults have tended to rise during times of existential crisis.

The Nazis, with their industrialized slaughter of people they were obsessed were impure and were a death cult. The Khmer Rouge had envisioned a Year Zero ideology and killing fields; they, too, were a death cult. What unites these movements is not so much their brutality as their nihilism-their belief that the world must be destroyed to be remade. This Death Cult is the variety of nihilism that the most virulent variety of modern Zionism shares, one fed by the impossibility of peace, the fantasy of coexistence, and the eradication of the enemy being the only solution. Gaza is not just a battlefield; it is a laboratory for this ideology, a place where the death cult's vision is made manifest. The symbolism is impossible to ignore.

The rubble of Gaza's homes, the bodies of its children, AI-targeted strikes that render human beings into "hard-kill targets"-these are not just acts of war. These are rituals performed with a precision that borders on reverence. The Talpiot-trained engineers who design these systems, the politicians who greenlight these strikes, and the settlers who cheer them on are not just participants in a conflict. They are acolytes in a cult of death. Yet this is a cult that is not without its contradictions.

It speaks to them in the language of morality- of "the most moral army in the world"-even as it rains fire on hospitals and schools. It mouths the words of democracy while imposing apartheid. It invokes the sanctity of life while generating death on an industrial scale. It's the hallmark of a death cult: not to appear as one, but to show up as noble while committing atrocities. The 67,000 dead are not just a tragedy. It bombs widows and their children as they mourn their previous losses, as "noble cause."

They are a revealing. They show the world what this death cult really is: a movement which has lost its way, a movement which has changed its humanity for the cold logic of machinery. The lavender AI, the precision strikes, and the demolition zones are not signs of strength. They are signs of despair, of a cult that can see no future except through the lens of destruction. And in this, they are not unique. History is littered with the ruins of such cults, with the ashes of their victims and the hollowed-out remains of their ideologies. The question is no longer whether this cult will fall but how many more will die before it does.

It has been confirmed from different sources that the ICC has issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant over accusations of war crimes. The cases are brought forth in regards to their positions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically over the 2023 Gaza War. 

In doing so, Netanyahu and Gallant are criminally responsible for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts. 

No public reports exist of any move by the ICC either to issue a warrant or take up a case against Joe Biden. Meanwhile, although the ICC has jurisdiction over individuals for a limited set of international crimes-mostly war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity-the Court's practice has been to focus on situations in which national jurisdictions are unable or unwilling genuinely to investigate and prosecute such crimes. No indication of that has come in relation to Biden.

To all of the lost souls who would argue against this, what would you label it, a "Religion?"

-###-

© 2025 Fred Gransville. All Rights Reserved.