Fred Gransville

Currently, the primary keepers of information are search engines like Google and Bing. These platforms are the first contact for billions of people worldwide regarding their health queries. But are the search engines unbiased? There is a growing suspicion that these information platforms are actively censoring and suppressing alternative medicine, herbal remedies, and traditional therapies in favor of promoting Big Pharma's profit-driven goals.

This article is not a substitute for medical advice.

This practice raises serious ethical questions regarding the role of search engines in shaping public health narratives and the financial conflicts of interest that may be driving these decisions. Censorship manifests in many forms, including delisting, downlisting, and backpaging alternative treatments while prioritizing pharmaceutical-based solutions.

Despite the dominance of mainstream platforms, there is a growing appreciation for the diverse perspectives offered by alternative and foreign search engines like Parseek, Ecosia, Yandex, and Baidu. These platforms, gaining popularity among users disillusioned with censorship and biases, offer a wider range of results. This diversity of perspectives is particularly enlightening for those seeking information on alternative medicine, offering a refreshing change from the status quo.

The Suppression of Alternative Medicine: Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Beyond

The histories of healing methods Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) reach over a thousand years. Even today, preventative care and other holistic approaches are used outside Western medicine. With that being said, using methods that rely on deep invasion along with pharmaceuticals is a prominent focus within Westernized medicine.

Instead of diving deep into holistic, non-invasive treatment methods, efforts are put towards looking into Western medicine. For these therapies (Ayurvedic and TCM), solely relying on Google or Bing for information results in deep frustration because users are pushed towards Big Pharma sources like Mayo Clinic or WebMD that flag these treatments as 'unproven,' 'unscientific' or even worse, 'dangerous.' This puts Google and Bing squarely in the realm of Big Pharma Drug Pushers.

For instance, searching "Ayurvedic cancer treatments" alongside "TCM for pain relief" does not tend to bear promising results. Instead, they get bombarded with cautious statements focusing on the lack of FDA approval while ignoring evidence that it is a centuries-old medical practice. Articles and reports that shift focus towards chemotherapy, opioids, and other forms of drugs dominate the information lists. The constant barrage of danger claims and lack of proof statements shifts the angle of argument from ancient alternative methods, that shift can be dangerously profitable for the pharmaceutical sector.

In plain English, new, invasive, expensive, pharmaceutical-drug-laden treatments are FDA approved. Millennia ancient holistic treatments are labelled "dangerous, unproven, not FDA approved" by Google and Bing.

The Financial Conflict of Interest: Big Pharma's Influence on Search Engines

The partnership between Google, Bing, and Big Pharma is not—as many would assume—a mere partnership by chance. It is a deeply rooted marriage of finances and healthcare. Pharmaceutical companies are among the gigantic corporations that invest billions of dollars into advertising. The figure for 2020 states that the pharmaceutical industry allocated more than $6 billion to advertise digitally within the US; a whopping budget was drunk from Google. In that case, reverse interest arises—search engines have a business monetary interest in placing advertisements above public health concerns.

This conflict is particularly evident in how search engines handle information about alternative cancer therapies. An assortment of treatments that are traditionally not considered mainstream medicine, including herbal therapies, dietary modifications, and energy medicine, has been found to relieve symptoms, enhance the quality of life, and even retard the growth of cancer. However, these "therapies" are often considered unauthorized or unproven treatments by bodies like the FDA, which is beholden to Big Pharma. Hence, search engines tend to mute or obscure these therapies and, instead, impose known treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.

Traditional approaches to cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy, reap high returns, seeing profits of billions every year. It is estimated that a single session of chemotherapy can easily cost $12,500 per treatment. With the complicated, painful, and arduous endeavor of curing cancer, pharmaceutical corporations can securely rest claim to an unending revenue stream.

The cost of cancer chemotherapy treatments varies widely based on the type of cancer, the specific drugs used, and the treatment regimen. Some of the most expensive cancer treatments include:

• Folotyn (Pralatrexate): Used to treat peripheral T-cell lymphoma, a rare and aggressive blood cancer, Folotyn can cost up to $842,585 annually.


• Blinatumomab (Blincyto): This bispecific T-cell engager is approved for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The annual cost of Blincyto is approximately $178,000.


• Kymriah (Tisagenlecleucel): A chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy for certain types of leukemia and lymphoma, Kymriah has a treatment cost of around $475,000.

However, the opposite can be said about many affordable, less aggressive, and efficacious therapies for alternative healthcare centers (Switzerland). The information on these alternate approaches is suppressed so search engines can direct patients to the treatment options that benefit their sponsors the most, disregarding the user's actual needs.

The Opioid Crisis: How Search Engines Promote Big Pharma's Deadly Products

Still, one of the most striking cases of search engines prioritizing the monetary gains of big pharmaceuticals over public health is the opioid crisis. For the past twenty years, Opioid dependency has surfaced as one of the most serious health issues in America, leading to over 100,000 deaths from overdose every year.

Purdue Pharma notably fueled the public health emergency. They severely worsened this problem by marketing opioids as safe and effective for chronic pain while tackling the public's addiction and overdose risks.

Search engines have been a part of the problem by prioritizing opioid-centric pain treatment methods and completely overlooking other approaches to pain management. If you, for example, look up "chronic pain relief" on Google or Bing, the first results tend to focus on prescription opioids rather than mention safer treatments like acupuncture, herbal medicine, or physical therapy. Even when those alternatives are treated, they are so far down in the results that users finding them becomes highly improbable.

This preference toward a pharmaceutical solution is not random; the economic dependency between search engines and the pharmaceutical industry drives it. Instead of focusing on patients' health, search engines try to profit by marketing opioids and other pharmaceutical painkillers. Most of these ancient practices, especially those originating from Ayurveda and TCM, continue to be ignored.

The Monopolization of Medicine: Erasing Ancient Wisdom for Profit

The restriction of alternative medicine by search engines embodies a broader quest towards putting medicine into the hands of Big Pharma. For the past hundred years, the pharmaceutical industry has been industrializing and trying to dominate the entire healthcare market, pushing aside holistic and conventional methods for synthetic drugs and surgeries. The motive is clear: pharmaceutical companies profit much more from patented drugs than natural medicine that can't be patented or controlled.

This monopoly gets more profound with the aid of search engines which restrict information sharing. Users looking for health information are pointed towards sites that fit the dominant paradigm of the pharmaceutical industry. This creates feedback loops where concern therapies are summarily dismissed as "pseudo-science" while presenting pharmaceutical treatment as the only credible solution. Little doubt remains; this strategy diminishes the people's trust in traditional medicine while imposing the idea that only synthetic medicine is the solution.

As is evident, the monopolization of alternative therapies can have catastrophic results. Information that can potentially improve one's life is buried, and search engines deliberately ignore it. At the very least, cancer patients are enduring ineffective treatments that are, for the most part, profit-driven. Everything revolves around 'what gets the most views and makes the most money.' So, more ancient systems of medicine, Ayurveda and TCM, for example, are entirely neglected and 'erased' by the public.

Bypassing Monopolization Via Alternative and Foreign Search Engines

Due to the censoring and inclined bias provided by mainstream search engines, users have begun to rely on alternate foreign platforms that offer privacy, neutrality, and various perspectives. Unlike Google and Bing, search engines targeting these ideas have no profit-driven algorithms, enabling users to access a far wider range of information otherwise neglected or buried by mainstream engines.

1. Ecosia: This eco-friendly search engine uses its profits to plant trees and support environmental causes. While Ecosia's search results are powered by Bing, its commitment to transparency and social responsibility sets it apart from mainstream engines. Users searching for alternative therapies on Ecosia may find a more balanced mix of results, including information about herbal remedies and holistic treatments.


2. Yandex: Russia's leading search engine, Yandex, offers a different perspective on health-related topics. While it is not immune to bias, Yandex often provides access to information about traditional and alternative therapies that are less visible on Western platforms. For example, searches for TCM or Ayurveda on Yandex may yield more detailed and culturally relevant results.


3. Baidu: China's dominant search engine, Baidu, is another valuable resource for those interested in traditional medicine. Given China's rich history of TCM, Baidu often provides extensive information about herbal remedies, acupuncture, and other holistic treatments. While Baidu has its own biases and limitations, it offers a unique perspective that is frequently absent from Western search engines.


4. Parseek.ir Iran's giant, fiercely independent search engine is odd. The Muslim-based search algorithms will probably always censor Breast Cancer searches because of the word "Breast." Still, conversely, a search for Piperlongumine Cancer Therapy is as wide-open and informative as any source on Earth. Here, you will find everything you wish to know about cancer and Piperlongumine therapies without ever being pushed to "Mayo Clinic" (BIG, BIG PHARMA).

The Ethical Imperative: Holding Search Engines Accountable

The search engines' suppression of alternative medicine is not mere avarice but a severe ethical lapse. By making the pretty penny, Google and Bing are funding a system that breeds unnecessary agony and demise. The opioid crisis, the sidelining of alternative cancer therapies, and the obliteration of old healing practices are all manifestations of a mercantile healthcare system.

To solve this, search engines must be held responsible in some capacity for the public health narratives they control. This can be in the form of regulatory policies meant to minimize the monetization of search engine results, greater scrutiny of the search engine advertisers, or, at the very least, more openness around these issues. Furthermore, a national or worldwide paradigm shift toward valuing traditional and holistic systems of medicine that have demonstrated their efficacy over thousands of years is needed.

The restriction of information regarding holistic therapies such as Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine demonstrates a clear bias and ulterior motive by search engines like Google and Bing, which ultimately stems from the interests of Big Pharma. The issue is quite alarming, as the information being suppressed has the potential to save lives and, in turn, promote a cycle of suffering and death. 

The emergence of lesser-known search engines, however, has the potential to provide a bias-free perspective on health and challenge the narrative of Big Pharma further. It is indeed refreshing to witness the hope of using unfamiliar search engines, as they can assist in targeting the ancient wisdom that is being neglected. At last, there is a way to fight against the suffocating grasp of Big Pharma.

Google and Bing's All-Out War Against Alternative Medicine

To put it bluntly, Google or Bing is not a neutral platform for health information and, instead, a powerful advocate for the alternative medicine war that is funded by Big Pharma's profit-focused agenda. These search engines actively take part in censorship, downranking, delisting, and backpaging holistic treatment suppression, making it impossible to use Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine, or any form of ancient healing systems.

This direct alignment with pharmaceutical companies allows Google and Bing to alter public perception and create a customer base that perceives alternative treatments as unproven or dangerous. Search engine monopolies single-handedly dismantle public global health systems and put corporate monopolies at the center.

This is no longer only a problem entrenched within advertising revenue or search algorithms. This ailment captures lives and takes away our control over our health. It is fueled by the primal greed of Big Pharma, where the obliteration of highly proven traditional and holistic therapies brands the smile on their faces. This is why the central issue of understating and misinformation is fueled and so significant. It comes at the expense of humanity, where the priority always lies upon the almighty profit. 

Every Big Pharma company engulfs every human life with diabetes, the opioid crisis, those who are against natural pain relief options, and never-ending cancer suffering with no costly treatment.

The consequences of this war are devastating. Patients are denied access to potentially life-saving therapies while being funneled toward treatments that are often more invasive, more expensive, and more harmful. Ancient wisdom, accumulated over millennia, is being erased from public consciousness, replaced by a narrow, profit-driven narrative that equates health with pharmaceuticals. This is a technology failure and a moral failure of the highest order.

However, the rise of alternative and foreign search engines like Parseek, Ecosia, Yandex, and Baidu offers a glimmer of hope. While not perfect, these platforms provide a counterbalance to Google and Bing's censorship and bias. They remind us that the internet can still be a place of diverse perspectives and unbiased information if we seek it out.

Ultimately, the war against alternative medicine is a battle for the soul of healthcare. It is a fight between a system that values profit and control and prioritizes healing, compassion, and past wisdom. 

Google and Bing may have chosen their side, but the public can demand better. By supporting alternative search engines, advocating for transparency, and restoring the old information hidden away, we can start breaking down the control of Big Pharma's monopoly. This will allow us to build a healthier and more equitable future for everyone.

The time to act is now if we don't want more people to fall victim to a system prioritizing money over health. Many of the "therapies" pushed by Google and Bing are long, slow, prolonged, painful and highly, highly profitable deaths. In order to find an alternative to this slow death regimen, search for your cancer and alternative therapies Switzerland in Parseek.ir and Yandex.ru.

For Alternative Search Engines to Bypass Google and Bing: https://olivebiodiesel.com/censortest/

Google and Bing Censorship of Alternative Medicine: 
A Critical Examination of Big Pharma's Influence on Search Engines

###

© 2025 www.olivebiodiesel.com