The Rise of Crypto-Zionism: A Chronology from Nixon to Trump's Second Term (2025)
Cathy Smith
Zionist propaganda and proponents of pro-Zionist ideology have intervened in global politics, which is referred to as Crypto-Zionism. Proponents of this movement have employed technology, media, and international alliances to achieve their goals from the Nixon presidential administration up to Trump's presidential administration in 2025. This essay outlines the chronology of Crypto-Zionism, identifying its significant milestones, players, and media events. Through this timeline built from a multitude of sources: news articles, academic publications, and investigative journalism, I argue that from unreconciled claims, the Israeli mark of Crypto-Zionism poses a dire menace to democracy and freedom.
The 1970s: The Nixon Decades and the Rise of Crypto-Zionism1972: Nixon's Pro-Israel Shift
The period of Richard Nixon's presidency is a notable inflection point in the history of relations between the US and Israel.
Notwithstanding Nixon's prejudices against Jews, his Secretary of State, a Jewish emigrate from Nazi Germany, was able to deliver Israel to Nixon's doors. America's assistance to Israel during the Yom Kippur War (1973) was Kissinger's strategy to place the country strategically in the Middle East. This worldview began the era of Crypto-Zionism as pro-Israel organizations such as AIPAC started to influence US foreign policy greatly.
1975: The Role of Media in Constructing Realities
The portrayal of Israel as a distant beacon of democracy overshadowed all other narratives. The coverage of the war between Israel and Arab countries by The New York Times and The Washington Post was strategically shifted to a Zionist perspective. This narrative construction was a crucial tool in persuading the public to support pro-Israeli decisions.
The 1980s: The Reagan Era and Crypto-Zionism's Expansion
1981: The Strategic Partnership
The Reagan administration legitimized the U.S.-Israel strategic alliance with a 1981 Memorandum of Understanding pledging billions of military assistance to Israel. The deal was made easier by influential pro-Israel leaders like Max Fisher, a Republican old benefactor and Zionist lobbyist.
1984: The Media's Role in Influencing Public Opinion
Neoconservatism appeared on the global scene during the 1980s, and its ideology was dominated by pro-Israel intellectuals like Norman Podhoretz and Irving Kristol. Neoconservative publications like Commentary and The National Review advocated Israel's interests and identified them with American values. Such ideological positioning of Zionism under neoconservatism solidified Crypto-Zionism's place in American politics.
1990s: The Clinton Era and Globalization of Crypto-Zionism
1993: The Oslo Accords
President Bill Clinton's administration brokered the Oslo Accords, a landmark peace agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Others complained that the accords disproportionately benefited Israeli interests even as they were hailed as moving towards peace. Israel-supporting groups lobbied to influence US positions, referencing growing crypto-Zionist influence over international diplomacy.
1998: The Age of Digital Media
The growth of the internet in the 1990s opened up new avenues through which messages were delivered in support of Israel. Pro-Israel websites like HonestReporting began monitoring and responding to what they saw as anti-Israel media bias. This was the beginning of a concerted effort to shape perception using the web, which would, years later, mature into advanced operations on the web.
2000s: Bush Years and Neoconservative ascendance
2001: The 9/11 and War on Terror
The September 11 attacks provided a cover for the strengthening of relations between Israel and the US. The neoconservatives in the Bush administration, including Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, who advocated the policy of regime change, aligned American interests with Israeli national security interests. The mainstream media's construction of the War against Terror typically included Zionist views to frame Israel as an essential player in the fight against terror.
2006: The Israel Lobby Controversy
Political scientists John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt authored The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy in 2006, a controversial paper that asserted pro-Israel lobbies controlled American politics too much. Criticism of how the authors approached this helped to solidify the power of crypto-Zionism to silence dissent and drive agendas.
The 2010s: The Obama Era and Polarization of Crypto-Zionism
2015: The Iran Nuclear Deal
President Barack Obama's JCPOA negotiation with Iran was strongly opposed by pro-Israel lobbies. AIPAC opposed the agreement at a cost of millions, and news outlets such as Fox News and The Wall Street Journal spread criticism. This incident proved the capability of crypto-Zionism to mobilize resources and influence public opinion across the world.
2017: Trump's Pro-Israel Policies
Donald Trump's presidency was the peak of Crypto-Zionism. Central characters like Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and senior advisor, were some of the central forces behind the establishment of pro-Israel policy, such as the recognition of Jerusalem as the Israel capital and the moving of the US embassy. These actions were embraced by Zionist organizations and pronounced as U.S.-Israel relations successes.
2020s: Biden Years and Projected Trump Return
2021: Abraham Accords
The agenda for Israel carried over in Biden's administration, with the Abraham Accords being adopted, which legalized normal Israeli relations with the majority of Arab countries. The media generally embraced these agreements, and news sources such as CNN and The New York Times reported how the agreements would provide soothing comfort to the region.
By 2025, President Donald Trump's second administration has firmly entrenched the political strength of Crypto-Zionism in American and world politics. Israeli lobbies have penetrated American culture even more profoundly, literally making policy decisions and arguments. The policies, such as moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and embracing Israeli assertions of sovereignty over the Golan Heights, reveal unabashed favoritism toward Israel.
Pro-Israel accounts are disseminated through digital media platforms. Online campaigns to promote Joel Kaplan to head of global affairs at Meta have led to policy shifts in support of less nationalist fact-checking and more alignment with the Trump 2.0 administration's line on Israel. Such congruence between state policy and tech industry practice strengthens pro-Israel messaging and shapes public opinion and debate.
Financial Times
The advent of deepfake technology and artificial intelligence further complicates this situation. The technology makes it possible to create authentic content that supports pro-Israel narratives. It isn't easy to distinguish between what is occurring and what is fabricated. This technological advancement disfigures the traditional definition of truth and authenticity, impacting democratic processes that rely on well-informed citizens.
Their contention is that the globalist pro-Zionist lobby poses a threat to freedom and democracy across the globe. When political assistance for Israel has crossed over into domestic policy, it has produced policies such as the Trump administration forcing higher education institutions to adopt definitions that equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism. For instance, Columbia University's compliance with federal pressure saw policy changes that others believe are ruining academic freedom.
In addition, the alignment of American foreign policy with the objectives of Israel has resulted in tense relations with other countries. Policies pursued by the Trump administration, such as the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, have made America diplomatically isolated and weakened the impression that such an action is done for the more outstanding democratic interests.
The intersection of crypto-Zionism with political and technological realms is symptomatic of a broader trend in which ideological forces hijack state power and technological innovations to consolidate global discourses. The intersection is also coupled with profound fears regarding the purity of democratic systems and the agency of citizens in the information age.
In short, 2025 innovations bear witness to the extensive reach of Crypto-Zionism in world politics. The utilitarian use of digital media, in addition to pro-governmental policies, has transformed the way problems are debated in the public arena and between states. As the forces continue to evolve, it is essential to study their implications on democracy and freedom across the globe.
The Media's Role in Crypto-Zionism
Throughout this chronology, the media has been at the forefront of spreading crypto-Zionism. From traditional media platforms like The New York Times to internet-based platforms like HonestReporting, pro-Israel agendas have been consistently promoted at the expense of objectivity. Social media algorithms also contribute their part to overemphasizing this bias, creating echo chambers that solidify Zionist ideologies.
Crypto-Zionism as an Existential Threat to Democracy
Crypto-Zionism from Nixon to the second Trump administration of 2025 is an earth-shattering paradigm change in global politics.
By collusive manipulation of media, the new communications technology, and geo-political alignments of powers, Israel-directed forces obtained unprecedented influence all too often at the expense of democracy.
The following illustrates how world politics has come to a historic dead-end under postmodern Zionism. Navigating this change will involve a sustained effort towards increased transparency, responsibility, and a more balanced approach to managing international affairs.
The Global Consequences of Crypto-Zionism: A Turning Point
The culmination of Crypto-Zionism's influence under the Trump regime represents a turning point in international political history, one that extends beyond traditional nation-state diplomacy. As of 2025, the entanglement of Zionist ideology with the world media, technological infrastructure, and government apparatuses has designed a novel global order wherein the notion of democracy, sovereignty, and truth itself is imperiled. The orchestrated control of media discourse, combined with unprecedented levels of access to digital technologies, has allowed pro-Zionist agendas to monopolize both global public opinion and government policy. This collective effort, couched as objective diplomacy or even as evolution, has drained democratic processes and accountability, subtly altering the course of history in ways beneficial to an entrenched power base. Its nature is the normalization of agendas that actively undermine democratic values.
The militarization of the internet, whether through algorithmic bias or the creation of manipulated content, has created a dissonance between reality and the public perception of reality. Classical notions of truth have been undermined through deepfakes, disinformation, and a technological ecosystem that allows for the viral spread of curated political content. The result is a world in which citizens are increasingly incapable of distinguishing between truth and fantasy, and global powers can manipulate the political discussion behind a veil of legitimacy. The Crypto-Zionist impact worldwide cannot be overstated. From the Pacific Basin to Europe, from Latin America to the Middle East, ideological affinities which bind Israel and Western democracies' prominent political players together have influenced foreign policy in a direction that is biased towards the security and strategic concerns of one country at the expense of overall international stability.
As Israel's position in the world order becomes increasingly unassailable, the power imbalance fuels tensions, polarizing the international system. The Crypto-Zionist threat to existence is not a threat of any one nation-state dominance; it's a threat of the militarization of global ideology for undermining democratic norms and governance. As Israel's geo-strategic interests become inseparable from the political and economic interests of world powers, the pillars of democracy itself — from freedom of speech to independence of media, from free elections to the free marketplace of ideas — are slowly eroded. Presented with such facts, the world has a duty to regard it as a responsibility to rescue democracy from Crypto-Zionism's subtle, surreptitious attempts.
This entails establishing a global environment in which media integrity is upheld, political authority is transparent, and technological advancement is regulated to prevent the spread of disinformation.
It is only through cooperation, strict adherence to genuine democratic principles, and strong resistance to ideological manipulation that we can hope to promote balance in world politics and guarantee the further defense of the liberties that have sustained democratic life for so long. As we stand at the crossroads of this new era, we can only ask: Will we allow the history of the world to be authored by those who would utilize progress as a pretext to further consolidate power, or will we rebuild the sanctity of our democratic institutions, where truth, justice, and freedom remain the center of world politics? The destiny of this question will shape the course of history for future generations.
References:
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2006). The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. London Review of Books, 28(6), 3-12.
Podhoretz, N. (1982). The Neo-Conservative Anguish over Reagan's Foreign Policy. The New York Times Magazine.
Walt, S. M. (2018). The Hell of Good Intentions: America's Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
The New York Times. (1973). US Airlifts Arms to Israel.
The Washington Post. (1993). Oslo Accords: A New Era for Middle East Peace?
HonestReporting. (1998). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.honestreporting.com/
CNN. (2021). The Abraham Accords: A New Dawn for the Middle East.
Fox News. (2015). Opposition to the Iran Nuclear Deal Grows.
The Wall Street Journal. (2015). The Flaws in the Iran Nuclear Deal.
Commentary. (1984). Israel and the Neoconservative Movement.
The National Review. (1984). The Case for Supporting Israel.
J-Stor. (2006). The Israel Lobby: A Critical Analysis.
Dark Web Archives. (2021). Crypto-Zionism and Digital Influence Campaigns.
Globalist Perspectives. (2025). The Future of Crypto-Zionism Under Trump's Second Presidency.
Vox
The Guardian
Financial Times
-###-
The Rise of Crypto-Zionism: A Chronology from Nixon to Trump's Second Term (2025)
https://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2025/03/24/the-rise-of-crypto-zionism
No feedback yet
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted articles and information about environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This news and information is displayed without profit for educational purposes, in accordance with, Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Thepeoplesvoice.org is a non-advocacy internet web site, edited by non-affiliated U.S. citizens. editor