Pages: << 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 1261 >>
Dr. Althea Mentes
An Exposé of The Brain Police
Mental health care has always been in conflict and dispute, struggling with deep-seated cultural perceptions, changing medical practices, and a growing tide of mighty industry profit. What is often portrayed as an altruistic mission of healing and support is, in many instances, steeped in a long history of exploitation, control, and harm. From the days of crude bloodletting to corporate-driven over-medication of vulnerable people, one sees how, time and again, the mental health industry has failed to live up to its ethical obligations. This article tries to look into these disturbing histories and present practices to see how mental illness has been commodified, manipulated, and even weaponized for profit. At the same time, millions of people are still marginalized, labeled, and left to suffer.
Every large extended family has an eccentric person, Alzheimer’s patient, or a Type-A driven high achiever, or an Obsessive-Compulsive controller, etc. The stigmatization today is far worse, thanks to Big Pharma and Health Care Corporations raking in obscene profits and running astroturf “community-based” pill-pusher movements.
By David Swanson
Like the Republican Party whose senators will make Pete Hegseth the next U.S. Secretary of War, Hegseth is a bad joke. The Democratic minority in the horribly unrepresentative Senate is a joke you might hear at an amateur mic night.
Hegseth is a guy who has reportedly shouted “Kill all Muslims.” Nobody asked him if he had done that or if he agreed with it — not even when he claimed to have been labeled an extremist purely for having a Christian tattoo. He’s a guy who has told troops in Iraq to disobey an order and shoot on sight rather than only when threatened. No senator asked who was included in acceptable targets or why. He’s said the Geneva Conventions should be ignored. One Republican senator asked him how many pushups he could do and how many human genders there are.
Several asked if he’d be sure to spend a lot on weapons. (He would.) While Hegseth denounces government spending and has appeared in photographs wearing “Big Government Sucks” on his chest, on Tuesday he repeatedly claimed — falsely and laughably — that Congress had cut military spending during Biden’s years in the White House. Asked by Senate Armed “Services” Chairman Roger Wicker if spending less than 3% of GDP on militarism endangered the United States (Wicker seemed to falsely suggest that the United States does spend less than that) Hegseth agreed.
Tracy Turner
Albertsons Safeway Vons GMOs Pesticides Chemicals Article
The real question in the 21st century is not "Are we living in a simulation?" but "Are we living in a prison?" Welcome to the Digital Matrix-a highly interconnected web of surveillance, AI, predictive analytics, and corporate greed that seeks to trap every aspect of our lives for profit. While in the movie version of The Matrix, human beings were physically plugged into an artificial simulation, the real Digital Matrix operates invisibly through our devices, the networks we navigate, and the data we provide. It feeds into an ecosystem in which your smartphone, laptop, credit card transactions, and patterns on social media coagulate in effect to serve and reinforce control-pervasive and insidious, franken-dystopian constructions more nightmarish than any Hollywood ever dreamed of.
This exposé explores this digital prison that is set up and well-developed by pivotal entities such as Palantir, Google, Apple, Boeing, NSA, Mossad Unit 8200, Amazon, Microsoft, and many others. It's not just a data collection; they use it to control you. The question is no longer if we are being watched but how much of our lives are being analyzed, commodified, and sold back to us, masquerading as "convenience" and "innovation." The world of Surveillance Control Capitalism is here already, and it is in full bloom.
Paul Craig Roberts
I am being asked if the issuance by the dreadful Biden regime of a new package of sanctions against Russian oil exports are a gift to the incoming Trump presidency or a poisoned chalice. My answer is neither. The sanctions, if the incoming Trump regime leaves them in place, are a poisoned chalice for the American consumer and for America’s European allies or puppets. If the sanctions succeed, reducing the world’s supply of oil in the market will drive up prices. The demand for oil is inelastic with respect to price. A higher price of oil will increase Russian oil renevues and hurt everyone else.
In Germany industry is already leaving to locate in countries with less costly energy. This will leave Germans unemployed. American commute times mean that higher energy prices cut into discretionary income and consumer spending, reducing the outlook for growth and profits. For Russia it means a higher oil revenues. If I were in charge in Russia, I would not sell energy to enemies conducting war against Russia. Russia can finance its domestic developments without foreign exchange. Michael Hudson and I have explained this many times. We are amazed that Putin tolerates the incompetence or worse of his central bank director, whose 21% interest rates are a worse threat to Russia than NATO, American sanctions, and the remnants of the Ukrainian army.
Cathy Smith
The media landscape underwent a significant shift, marked by the decline of traditional news media and the emergence of alternative journalism. This transition was accompanied by a range of challenges, from political coverage to human rights, health, environmental sustainability, social problems, technological advances, global wars, and cultural narratives. Most independent outlets, with their promise of fresh, untainted voices, found it difficult to cover these critical topics. They often found themselves entangled in corporate-governmental webs, which diminished their proclaimed independence and effectiveness.
In 2023 and 2024, the decline of mainstream news has become a spectacle for anyone still clinging to the belief that media outlets like Fox, CNN, MSNBC, and the BBC serve the public good. These institutions, once champions of journalistic integrity, now seem to be more concerned with pandering to their political audiences than addressing the global challenges of our time. The narrative has shifted from being a resource for information to merely a tool for state-run media to push agendas, with the likes of Sputnik and TASS as the gold standards of media manipulation. This isn"t a coincidence--state control of information is no longer hidden behind closed doors but proudly on display, eroding credibility and dismantling any vestige of media integrity. The so-called "news" delivered by these outlets is increasingly shaped by media bias and the whims of political power, all while audiences are left questioning whether they can still trust anything they hear or read. It"s almost as if the headlines themselves are part of some twisted political narrative, crafted to obscure the truth rather than illuminate it.
Fred Gransville
Abstract
The rapid urbanization of California's fire-prone zones, driven by large-scale land developments known as McMansionization, has resulted in significant ecological disruption, heightened wildfire risks, and undermining fire ecology. Exacerbating this trend are such advanced technologies as satellite surveillance, directed energy weapons, and space-based lasers, potentially used for environmental manipulation or control. This paper aims to deepen our understanding of how McMansionization intersects with Agenda 21—a United Nations sustainability program—and how corporate greed and technological advancement could lead to environmental destruction, social control, and population management. By discussing the wider socio-political ramifications of untrammeled development and technological overreach in California through ecological analysis and critiques from experts with PhDs, we hope to engage you in this crucial issue.
The fire-prone zones of California have increasingly become targets for large-scale real estate development, a trend colloquially known as McMansionization. This endeavor of human greed and avarice disrupts fire ecology and promotes the risks of disastrous wildland fires, with McMansionization playing a central role in this disruption. In the interest of profit, developers tend to overlook the long-term environmental implications of such urbanization, which political lobbying and regulatory leniency enhance.
by Tracy Turner
In 1986-1987, California had suffered three major earthquakes that caused immense destruction. The disasters led to the U.S. government committing over $1 trillion in various federal and FEMA relief. This paper compares the economic impact brought about by the earthquakes of 1986-1987 and the 2025 wildfires of Los Angeles and estimates necessary federal aid as well as potential economic recovery. The following analysis, with specific calculations and financial comparisons, shows how the 2025 wildfires could require an even higher level of federal investment than the earthquakes and be a national economic stimulus.
Earthquake | Economic Loss (Nominal) | Adjusted for Inflation | Total FEMA & Federal Relief |
Northridge Earthquake (1994) | $44 billion | $75 billion | $500 billion |
Whittier Narrows (1987) | $358 million | $800 million | $15 billion |
Sierra Madre (1986) | $100 million | $225 million | $5 billion |
Total Economic Loss | $50 billion | $76 billion | $1 trillion |
By David Swanson, World BEYOND War
The U.S. Secretary of State has taken a break from demanding more weapons shipments to fuel the genocide in Palestine, to announce that he has “recognized” a genocide in Sudan.
Blinken says he has based his determination on the horrific killing of civilians in Sudan, without citing any evidence of intent to commit genocide. It is the voluminous evidence of that intent that distinguishes the genocide in Gaza from most wars, virtually every one of which in recent decades has amounted to a mass slaughter of mostly civilians — and most of which have been more one-sided than the war in Sudan.
Bush Obama Trump America US Kill List Disposition Matrix
By Melanie Poon
The NSA, FBI and LEIU (National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Law Enforcement Intelligence Units) and Fusion Centers have been and are sub-contracting their harassment of targeted individuals to cadres of neighborhood sociopaths. Writers caveat: blame Bush and Obama for this NSA Psycho-Syndicate-mess; Trump “inherited” this manured mess.
Before reaching the heart of the article, some myths to dispel. Myth one, it is touchless torture… …what part of Morgellons infection, being assaulted with man-made bioweapons, is “touchless”, or the implied, “harmless”. Myth two, the NSA only does "soft kill" on U.S. Citizens… ...the NSA buckeyball death canisters are hard-kill, not “softkill”.
The NSA Criminal Syndicate, aka “The Syndicate” has a number of ways that they decomposition torture (Zersetzung) a Targeted Individual:
by Janet Campbell
Image via Pexels
Choosing to move closer to an elderly family member or friend who needs your help is a major life decision, filled with emotional and logistical challenges. Without question, your support and presence can make a world of difference. This guide walks you through this significant transition, providing key steps to ensure a smooth and beneficial move for both parties involved.
Get to Know Your New Neighborhood
Before making the move, it's crucial to get to know your potential new surroundings. Before moving to a new neighborhood, it's essential to research the area thoroughly to understand " target="_blank">factors like crime rates, school quality, and nearby amenities such as grocery stores, parks, and public transportation. Additionally, connecting with local residents through online forums or social media can provide valuable insights and recommendations about the neighborhood.